Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 20;9(1):e001241. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001241

Table 4.

Respiratory function at baseline and post a single session of lung volume recruitment

Variable N Baseline Post-LVR Observed mean difference (95% CI) P value
Crs (L/cmH2O) 65 0.0377±0.0258 0.0415±0.0270 0.0038 (0.0001 to 0.0075) 0.047
LIC (L) 78 1.99±1.02 2.12±1.07 0.13 (0.05 to 0.21) 0.002
VC (L) 78 1.57±0.86 1.54±0.84 −0.03 (−0.07 to 0.01) 0.142
LIC–VC (L) 78 0.42±0.50 0.57±0.43 9.4 (2.9 to 15.8) 0.0003
LIC–VC (%VC) 78 36.5±45.9 45.9±43.8 0.16 (0.07 to 0.24) 0.005
FRC (L) 49 1.39±0.98 1.36±0.97 −0.03 (−0.09 to 0.03) 0.348
TLC (L) 49 2.64±1.45 2.60±1.41 −0.03 (−0.10 to 0.03) 0.266
RV (L) 49 1.00±0.73 0.99±0.71 −0.02 (−0.07 to 0.04) 0.610
ERV (L) 49 0.38±0.32 0.37±0.34 −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.02) 0.435
IC (L) 49 1.24±0.70 1.25±0.67 0.00 (−0.04 to 0.04) 0.890
PCF (L/min) 78 175.5±69.1 169.9±57.6 −5.6 (−15.0 to 3.9) 0.244
PCFLIC (L/min) 77 174.8±56.7 186.4±57.9 11.6 (3.7 to 19.5) 0.005
PCFLIC – PCF 77 −1.5±51.9 15.7±39.5 17.2 (4.2 to 30.2) 0.010

Total number of participants who completed assessments at both time points=78. Data are presented as mean±SD and mean difference (95% CIs). (n)=the number of participants with technically acceptable measurements at both time points. Results were not obtainable in all due to bulbar impairment, technical issues or fatigue. P value represents paired t-test comparison; data in bold indicate statistically significant values (p<0.05).

Crs, respiratory system compliance; ERV, expiratory reserve volume; FRC, functional residual capacity; IC, inspiratory capacity; LIC, lung insufflation capacity; LVR, lung volume recruitment; PCF, peak cough flow; PCFLIC, PCF from LIC; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity; VC, vital capacity.