Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 22;114:103562. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2022.103562

Table 2.

Multivariate results

Structural Equation Model (N=6,241)
PT frequency Perceived stress in travel Perceived safety in PT
Measurement model factor loadings
Perceived safety at stations 1
Perceived safety onboard 0,869 41,92 ***
Perceived accident safety 0,46 59,35 ***
Independent variable regression coefficients
Female 0,204 5,50 *** 0,121 2,48 * -0,046 -1,44
Age -0,015 -14,16 *** -0,025 -17,41 *** 0,006 7,78 ***
Oslo (ref=Stockholm) 0,127 3,01 ** -0,525 -9,44 *** 0,706 18,95 ***
Bergen (ref=Stockholm) -0,672 -17,02 *** -0,531 -12,72 *** 0,707 19,94 ***
Pandemic year 2020 (ref=2018) a 0,022 0,23 -0,386 -3,35 *** -0,041 -1,02
Significant interaction effects
Pandemic*Female -0,194 -3,44 *** 0,148 2,00 * -0,118 -2,46 *
Pandemic*Age -0,003 -2,10 * 0,005 2,30 * omitted b
Pandemic*Bergen 0,183 3,26 *** omitted b 0,147 3,21 ***
Relationships between dependent variables
Effect of PT frequency on... -0,031 -1,84 0,008 0,76
Correlation perceived stress in travel with... -0,377 -20,33 ***
Constant 4,320 64,20 *** -3,452 -30,83 ***
Dependent variable R2 .150 .100 .162
Overall model fit: Chi2(df) = 1,094(20)*** Model R2 = .326 RMSEA = .049 CFI = .973

Significance: *p≤.1; **p≤.05; ***p≤.01

a We also ran a model without interaction effects. In this non-interaction model the pandemic year has a significant negative effect on PT frequency.

b Non-significant interaction effects have been omitted from the model