Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 7;8(4):e42033. doi: 10.2196/42033

Table 5.

Interprofessional orientation and type of measurement.

Studies Effective IPa approach Outcome assessors Training format
Krones et al [32], 2008; Hirsch et al [64], 2010 Yes Yes
  • PROMb

Interactive format (including reflexivity strategies)
Murray et al [33], 2010 Yes Yes
  • OBOMc

Interactive format (including reflexivity strategies)
Sanders et al [56], 2017 Yes No
  • OBOM

  • OBOM

Interactive format (including reflexivity strategies)
Elwyn et al [34], 2004; Edwards et al [67], 2004; Longo et al [68], 2006 No No
  • OBOM

  • PROM

Interactive format (including reflexivity strategies)
Fossli et al [41], 2011 No No
  • OBOM

Interactive format (including reflexivity strategies)
Kennedy et al [42], 2013; Kennedy et al [69], 2010 No No
  • PROM

Interactive format (including reflexivity strategies)
Epstein et al [55], 2017; Butow et al [62], 2015 No No
  • PROM

Interactive format (including reflexivity strategies)
Bieber et al [35], 2006; Bieber et al [65], 2007 Yes No
  • PROM

  • HCPROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Stacey et al [36], 2008 Yes No
  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Loh et al [37], 2007 Yes No
  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Haskard et al [38], 2008 Yes No
  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Deinzer et al [39], 2009 Yes No
  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Feng et al [43], 2013 Yes No
  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Tinsel et al [44], 2013 Yes No
  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Hamann et al [3], 2007 No No
  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Bernhard et al [45], 2011; Butow et al [62], 2015 No No
  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Cooper et al [54], 2011 No No
  • PROM

  • PROM

  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Légaré et al [52], 2012; Allaire et al [70], 2012; Légaré et [71], 2013 No No
  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Cooper et al [53], 2013 No No
  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Wilkes et al [51], 2013 No No
  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Härter et al [57], 2015; Bieber et al [66], 2018 No No
  • PROM

  • OBOM

  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Tai-Seale et al [58], 2016; Dillon et al [63], 2017 No No
  • OBOM

  • PROM

  • OBOM

  • PROM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Ampe et al [59], 2017 No No
  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Cox et al [60], 2017 No Yes
  • OBOM

Interactive format (not including reflexivity strategies)
Hess et al [46], 2012 Yes Yes
  • OBOM

Unidirectional
O’Cathain et al [40], 2002 No No
  • PROM

Unidirectional
Koerner et al [47], 2014 No Yes
  • PROM

Unidirectional
Mathers et al [48], 2012 No No
  • PROM

Unidirectional
Rise et al [49], 2012; Rise et al [72], 2016 No No
  • PROM

Unidirectional
Sheridan et al [50], 2014 No No
  • PROM

Unidirectional
Coylewright et al [61], 2016 No No
  • OBOM

Unidirectional

aIP: interprofessional.

bPROM: patient-reported outcome measure.

cOBOM: observer-reported outcome measure.