Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 7;5(4):e38656. doi: 10.2196/38656

Table 2.

Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses comparing the intervention group (n=48) and control group (n=48) at the 16-week follow-up, showing the pooled statistics of the linear regression analyses of the 16-week follow-up outcome measures adjusted for the age of the person with dementia.

ITTa B SE Group P value 95% CI
SSCQb,c –0.057 0.335 .87 –0.715 to 0.602
MSPSSd,e –15.877 31.841 .62 –78.284 to 46.530
SSL-12f –2.511 1.551 .11 –5.550 to 0.528
LSg,h 0.576 0.792 .47 –0.976 to 2.128
LSNS-6i –1.586 1.495 .29 –4.524 to 1.352
PSSj 0.893 2.074 .67 –3.196 to 4.982
HADSk –0.541 0.536 .31 –1.591 to 0.509
PTg,l 0.031 0.524 .95 –1.011 to 1.073
CarerQolm 0.097 1.022 .93 –1.928 to 2.122
ICECAP-Od,n –0.013 0.024 .59 –0.060 to 0.034

a ITT is based on a multiple imputation Markov chain Monte Carlo method with 10 iterations.

bAdjusted for baseline scores.

cSSCQ: Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire.

dThis variable was negatively skewed, and a cubic transformation was used.

eMSPSS: Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Support.

fSSL-12: Social Support List 12-Interactions.

gThis variable was skewed, but no transformation could better approach a normal distribution; therefore, raw data are presented.

hLS: Loneliness Scale.

iLSNS-6: Lubben Social Network Scale.

jPSS: Perceived Stress Scale.

kHADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

lPT: perseverance time.

mCarerQol: Care and Quality of Life scale.

nICECAP-O: Investigating Choice Experiments for the Preferences of Older People Capability measure for Older People.