Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 9;4:100293. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100293

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and exercise compliance of all exercise group completers and participants included in the follow-up study (shown by group allocation and subgroups).

Completers
BIKE
MOD
VIG
VO2peak Improvers
VO2peak Reducers
(n=74) (n=14) (n=14) (n=18) (n=12) (n=12)
Characteristics
 Age, years 35 (7) 34 (8) 32 (7) 36 (8) 32 (9) 38 (7)
 Sex, women/men 37/37 8/6 6/8 9/9 9/3 7/5
Educational level
 Less than college, number (%) 40 (54%) 11 (79%) 6 (43%) 9 (50%) 7 (58%) 10 (84%)
 College, number (%) 25 (34%) 3 (11%) 4 (29%) 6 (33%) 5 (42%) 1 (8%)
 Graduate school, number (%) 9 (12%) 0 (0%) 4 (29%) 3 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%)
Job status
 Employed, number (%) 58 (79%) 11 (79%) 6 (43%) 16 (89%) 9 (75%) 10 (83%)
 Unemployed, number (%) 7 (9%) 1 (7%) 4 (29%) 1 (6%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%)
 Student, number (%) 9 (12%) 2 (14%) 4 (29%) 1 (6%) 3 (25%) 0 (0%)
Civil status and children
 Single, number (%) 17 (23%) 5 (36%) 4 (29%) 2 (11%) 5 (42%) 0 (0%)
 Cohabiting, number (%) 57 (77%) 9 (64%) 10 (71%) 16 (89%) 7 (58%) 12 (100%)
 Children, (yes) number (%) 40 (54%) 8 (57%) 6 (42%) 11 (61%) 6 (50%) 7 (58%)
Anthropometric variables
 Body weight, kg 91 (12) 88.0 (10.0) 90.9 (11.6) 92.0 (12.7) 88.0 (10.7) 87.7 (13.3)
 Body mass index, kg/m2 29.8 (2.4) 29.9 (2.7) 29.6 (2.0) 29.7 (2.3) 29.6 (3.0) 29.5 (2.2)
 Fat mass, kg 34.8 (7.2) 34.0 (7.7) 34.5 (7.9) 34.8 (5.6) 35.9 (7.3) 33.8 (7.7)
 Fat percentage, %a 39.0 (32.3; 44.5) 42.3 (29.1; 45.9) 38.1 (32.6; 43.2) 37.7 (30.8; 44.5) 40.9 (6.6) 38.9 (8.3)
 Fat free mass, kga 54.5 (45.0; 65.2) 53.6 (45.0; 59.7) 54.7 (49.1; 62.8) 54.6 (44.4; 69.3) 52.1 (9.3) 53.8 (12.5)
 Waist circumference, cmab 93.1 (87.8; 100.3) 96.3 (88.6; 98.2) 90.3 (88.2; 100.0) 99.2 (87.2; 102.4) 90.7 (7.9) 93.5 (9.3)
 Android fat, % 48.8 (6.0) 48.9 (6.7) 47.8 (6.9) 48.7 (5.5) 50.3 (5.5) 49.2 (7.0)
Exercise test variables
 VO2peak, ml O2/min 2689 (552) 2653 (473) 2851 (539) 2752 (622) 2594 (468) 2645 (476)
 Maximal heart rate, bpm 183 (10) 187 (11) 184 (6) 182 (11) 185 (11) 185 (8)
 Peak power output, W 194 (43) 191 (41) 207 (44) 195 (44) 186 (40) 191 (45)
Exercise compliance
 Compliance, % prescribed kcala 90 (81; 102) 90.0 (85.8; 100.8) 85.0 (81; 120) 85.0 (81.0; 99) 96 (94; 109)* 87 (77; 98)
 Exercise intensity, %VO2peak-reserve 55.9 (9.6) 53.2 (7.8) 48.7 (4.6) 64.8 (6.9) 57.7 (9.4) 58.8 (9.8)
 Exercise sessions per week 3.9 (0.5) 3.9 (0.3) 3.8 (0.5) 4.0 (0.6) 4.0 (3.8; 4.2) 3.9 (3.6; 4.2)
 Exercise duration, min per session 46 (12) 46 (10) 54 (10) 37 (8) 45 (11) 42 (9)
 Daily bike distance, km n.a. 14.0 (3.1) n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
 Intervention duration, days 192 (13) 189 (10) 192 (12) 195 (12) 188 (15) 197 (10)
Intervention group
 BIKE, number (%) 6 (50%) 2 (17%)
 MOD, number (%) 2 (17%) 3 (25%)
 VIG, number (%) 4 (33%) 7 (58%)

Data are shown as mean (SD) or number (%) except (a) which are shown as median (Q1; Q3). ‘Exercise groups’ include BIKE, MOD, and VIG. BIKE, active commuting group; MOD, moderate intensity exercise group; VIG, vigorous intensity exercise group; VO2, oxygen uptake; VO2peak improvers, participants who experienced the greatest improvements in VO2peak from baseline to follow-up; VO2peak reducers, participants who experienced the greatest reductions in VO2peak from baseline to follow-up. Exercise compliance during the intervention was compared between groups using 1-way ANOVA and between ‘VO2peak improvers’ and ‘VO2peak reducers’ using t-tests. *significantly different from ‘VO2peak reducers’. b: BIKE: n = 13.