TABLE 6.

The relationship between personal social capital and utility index.

		Total			Rural areas			Urban areas
		β	S.E	95% CI	β	S.E	95% CI	β	S.E	95% CI
Model 1	BOC	0.0009***	0.0010	0.00073–0.0111	0.0111***	0.0012	0.0089–0.0134	0.0069***	0.0018	0.0035–0.0103
	BRC	0.0015*	0.0009	0.0001–0.0003	−0.0039***	0.0011	–0.0062 to –0.0017	0.0076***	0.0014	0.0048–0.0105
Model 2	BOC	0.0068***	0.010	0.0049–0.0087	0.0086***	0.0012	0.0062–0.0109	0.0041*	0.0017	0.0006–0.0076
	BRC	0.0021*	0.0008	0.0004–0.0037	−0.0027*	0.0011	–0.0049 to –0.0006	0.0074***	0.0014	0.0045–0.0102
Model 3	BOC	0.0067***	0.0010	0.0047–0.0086	0.0082***	0.0012	0.0058 to –0.0106	0.0054**	0.0018	0.0018–0.0090
	BRC	0.0015*	0.0009	0.0002–0.0032	−0.0023*	0.0011	–0.0045 to –0.0001	0.0066***	0.0014	0.0038–0.0095
Model 4	BOC	0.0081***	0.0010	0.0061–0.0099	0.0098***	0.0012	0.0074–0.0122	0.0064***	0.0017	0.0030–0.0098
	BRC	−0.0011*	0.0008	–0.0028 to –0.005	−0.0056***	0.0011	–0.0078 to –0.0033	0.0040**	0.0014	0.0012–0.0068
Model 5	BOC	0.0051***	0.0010	0.0031–0.0071	0.0065***	0.0012	0.0041–0.0090	0.0043*	0.0017	0.0007–0.0078
	BRC	−0.0008*	0.0009	–0.0024 to –0.0009	−0.0035**	0.0011	–0.0057 to –0.0013	0.0031*	0.0014	0.0003–0.0060

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; S.E, standard error. For the urban and rural samples: Model 1: the crude model of BOC and BRC, Prob > Chi²; Model 2: adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age, marital status), Prob > Chi²; Model 3: adjusted for socioeconomic status (family income per capita, educational level, employment), Prob > Chi²; Model 4: adjusted for the number of chronic diseases and healthy behaviors (number of chronic diseases, smoking, drinking, regular exercise), Prob > Chi²; Model 5: adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, number of chronic diseases, and healthy behaviors, Prob > Chi².