Table 4.

Satisfaction survey on the assessment of resident standard training in department of prosthodontics [n (%)]

Investigated items	Very satisfied		Satisfied		Not satisfied		Very dissatisfied
	PG	NPG	PG	NPG	PG	NPG	PG	NPG
① Whether they are satisfied with the training plan and assessment	25(92.59%)	20 (68.97%)	2(7.41%)	9(31.03%)	0	0	0	0
② Whether they are satisfied with supervisor’s teaching ability (responsibility, theory, operation, problem, and solving ability)	26(96.30%)	26(89.66%)	1(3.70%)	3(10.34%)	0	0	0	0
③ Whether the assessors can give a practical, objective, fair assessment and regularly provide face-to-face feedback on performance in each test	27(100%)	28 (96.55%)	0	1(3.45%)	0	0	0	0
④ Whether supervisors can conduct targeted guidance according to the feedback results of assessment	27 (100%)	27 (93.10%)	0	2 (6.90%)	0	0	0	0
⑤ Whether the department attaches importance to this training and regularly organizes discussion of medical cases and professional skills learning	25 (92.59%)	27(93.10%)	2(7.41%)	2 (6.90%)	0	0	0	0
⑥ Whether they are satisfied with the improvement of their practical ability after the end of training	27(100%)	20(68.97%)	0	9(31.03%)	0	0	0	0

Note: PG prosthodontics group, NPG non-prosthodontics group