. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Dec 22.

Published in final edited form as: Psychosomatics. 2020 Apr 28;61(6):713–722. doi: 10.1016/j.psym.2020.04.008

Table 3:

Predictive Abilities for the Best-Fitting Combinations of Screening Questions (N=727)

Model	Screening Questions	Rate (95% CI)		Rate (95% CI)		LR (95% CI)			# of ASIQ positive cases misclassified as no risk
Model	Screening Questions	Sensitivity	Specificity	PPV	NPV	LR+	LR−	AUC	# of ASIQ positive cases misclassified as no risk
5	7,13,15,16,17	1.00 (0.90 - 1.00)	0.88 (0.85 - 0.90)	0.30 (0.22 - 0.38)	1.00 (0.99 - 1.00)	7.89 (6.30, 9.48)	0.02 (−0.03, 0.06)	0.938 (0.93 - 0.95)	0
4	7,13, 16,17	1.00 (0.90 - 1.00)	0.88 (0.86 - 0.91)	0.31 (0.23 - 0.40)	1.00 (0.99 - 1.00)	8.38 (6.63, 10.12)	0.02 (−0.03, 0.06)	0.941 (0.93 - 0.95)	0
3	7,16,17	0.97 (0.85 - 1.00)	0.90 (0.87 - 0.92)	0.33 (0.24 - 0.42)	1.00 (0.99 - 1.00)	9.16 (7.07, 11.25)	0.05 (−0.03, 0.12)	0.934 (0.90 - 0.96)	1
2	7,17	0.89 (0.74 - 0.97)	0.91 (0.89 - 0.93)	0.35 (0.25 - 0.45)	0.99 (0.98 - 1.00)	10.05 (7.33, 12.76)	0.13 (0.02, 0.25)	0.901 (0.85 - 0.95)	4
1	7	0.39 (0.23 - 0.57)	0.92 (0.90 - 0.94)	0.21 (0.12 - 0.33)	0.97 (0.95 - 0.98)	5.17 (2.67, 7.66)	0.66 (0.48, 0.83)	0.657 (0.58 - 0.74)	22
ASQ	7,15,16,18	1.00 (0.90 - 1.00)	0.89 (0.86 - 0.91)	0.32 (0.23 - 0.41)	1.00 (0.99 - 1.00)	8.81 (6.93, 10.69)	0.02 (−0.03, 0.06)	0.944 (0.93 - 0.96)	0