Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 25;10(12):3047. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10123047

Table 1.

Demographic data (N = 53) for the prediction models of the changes in symptom and functioning scores.

Baseline
(Mean ± SD)
Follow-Up
(Mean ± SD)
Change from Baseline
(Mean ± SD)
p-Value
Age 41.06 ± 11.733
Duration of illness 12.09 ± 9.185
Sex
Male (%) 13 (24.5)
Female (%) 40 (75.5)
Diagnostic subtype
Type I 31 (58.5)
Type II 22 (41.5)
Medication
Atypical antipsychotics (%) 35 (72.9)
Antidepressants (%) 22 (45.8)
Mood stabilizers (%) 37 (77.1)
Clinical assessment
YMRS 2.91 ± 4.861 3.08 ± 4.636 0.17 ± 5.049 0.8075
MADRS 9.64 ± 10.273 12.47 ± 10.789 2.83 ± 8.485 0.0187
PANSS 38.89 ± 11.265 40.43 ± 10.445 1.55 ± 10.745 0.2993
UKU 3.57 ± 3.208 4.42 ± 3.915 0.85 ± 3.319 0.0682
PSP 71.57 ± 10.231 71.42 ± 9.844 −0.15 ± 8.880 0.9020
GAF 71.75 ± 10.963 70.40 ± 11.394 −1.36 ± 9.909 0.3229

YMRS: Young Mania Rating Scale; MADRS: Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; PANSS: Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale; UKU: UKU Side Effects Rating Scale; PSP: Personal and Social Performance Scale; GAF: Global Assessment of Functioning. The medication data of five participants were missing. The p-value was obtained using a paired t test.