Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):1705. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12121705

Table 5.

Performance on discursive measures related to “lexical-semantic level” by diagnostic group.

CBS
(n = 15)
CBS-Non-AD
(n = 11)
CBS-AD
(n = 4)
CG
(n = 15)
CBS vs. CG
p-Value
CBS-Non-AD vs. CBS-AD vs. CG
p-Value
Open-class proportion 0.7 (0.1) 0.7 (0.1) 0.6 (0.1) 1.0 (0.2) <0.001 0.002 ab
Verb proportion 0.4 (0.1) 0.4 (0.1) 0.4 (0.0) 0.4 (0.0) 0.813 0.378
Lexical-semantic errors phw 4.4 (5.9) 3.7 (5.4) 6.3 (7.6) 0.7 (1.5) 0.012 0.013 b
% CIU 72.4 (17.3) 73.8 (16.9) 68.9 (20.2) 84 (6.9) 0.037 0.101

Note: Comparison analysis was first performed between CBS vs. CG and then performed between CBS-non-AD vs. CBS-AD vs. CG with Student’s t-test/ANOVA or the Mann–Whitney/Kruskal–Wallis test. Data are reported as the mean (SD); p is significant at the 0.05 level; a = CBS-non-AD vs. CG p-value > 0.05, b = CBS-AD vs. CG p-value > 0.05, c = CBS-non-AD vs. CBS-AD p-value > 0.05. Bold-faced values are statistically significant according to p values. Abbreviations: phw = per hundred words, CIU = correct information units, CBS = corticobasal syndrome patients, CBS-non-AD = corticobasal syndrome not related to Alzheimer’s disease patients, CBS-AD = corticobasal syndrome related to Alzheimer’s disease patients, and SD = standard deviation.