Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 3;12(12):1121. doi: 10.3390/bios12121121

Table 2.

Comparison of SERS and LSPR-based nanobiosensors for viral DNA detection.

Analytical Method Feature Target Required Time Detection Limit Ref
Raman Raman spectroscopy combined with the airPLS-PCA-PSOSVM model HBV DNA - - [58]
SERS Raman-sensitive system composed of ssDNA-immobilized Raman probe-functionalized Au nanoparticles (RAuNPs) on the graphene oxide (GO)/triangle Aunanoflower array. HBV, HPV-16, HPV-18 DNA 20 min 1 aM [59]
SERS AuNPs aggregation-based surface-enhanced Raman scattering (CRISPR/Cas-SERS) platform HPV DNA 40 min 6.72 pM [60]
SERS Au−Os−CO−Au Functionalized SERS-Active Substrate Epstein-Barr Virus DNA 30 min 600 copies/mL [61]
SERS Hierarchic-nanocube-assembly based SERS (H-Cube-SERS) bioassay to controllably amplify the electromagnetic field between gold nanocubes HAV DNA 30 min 100 aM [62]
LSPR Plasmonic CRISPR
Cas12a-based assay using DNA-functionalized AuNP
Red-Blotch Viral DNA 15 min 200 pM [67]
LSPR Plasmonic gold nanoparticles for ratiometric genosensing of Hepatitis C virus using citrate buffer and flash heating in enhancing the sensitivity HCV DNA 20 min - [68]