Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 3;12(12):1121. doi: 10.3390/bios12121121

Table 4.

Comparison of SERS and LSPR-based nanobiosensors for viral RNA detection.

Analytical Method Feature Target Required Time Detection Limit Ref
Raman Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) as Raman substrates with multivariate data analysis technique, PCA and PLSR HCV RNA - 2.55 log IU/mL [80]
SERS PCR-integrated detection system, silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) as SERS substrates with multivariate data analysis technique, PCA and PLS-DA HBV and HCV RNA - - [81]
SERS SERS-active silver nanorods (AgNRs) sensing chips and a specially designed smart unlocking-mediated target recycling signal amplification SARS-CoV-2 RNA 50 min 51.38 copies/mL [82]
SERS Gold nanostars functionalized with a Cy3-tagged beacon DNA for in vitro sensing Hemagglutinin (HA) segment - - [83]
LSPR Two-dimensional gold nanoislands (AuNIs) functionalized with complementary DNA receptors SARS-CoV-2 RNA 800 s 0.22 pM [84]
LSPR Gold and silver (Au–Ag) alloy nanoshells integrating LAMP method SARS-CoV-2 RNA 75 min 10 copies/rxn [85]
LSPR Plasmonic AuNPs capped with suitably designed thiol-modified antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) for colorimetric sensor SARS-CoV-2 RNA 10 min 0.18 ng/μL [86]
LSPR Colorimetric/SERS/fluorescence triple-mode biosensor based on 17 nm-sized AuNPs SARS-CoV-2 RNA 40 min 160 fM [87]