Chemo-ICI compared with Chemotherapy in 1st line ES-SCLC | |||||
Patient or population: 1st line ES-SCLC Intervention: Chemo-ICI Comparison: Chemotherapy | |||||
Outcomes | № of Participants (Studies) Follow Up |
Certainty of the Evidence (GRADE) |
Relative Effect (95% CI) |
Anticipated Absolute Effects | |
Risk with Chemotherapy | Risk Difference with Chemo-ICI | ||||
Progression-Free Survival | 3952 (10 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH |
HR 0.75 (0.70 to 0.80) [Survival] |
6 month | |
238 per 1000 | 103 more per 1000 (79 more to 128 more) |
||||
Overall Survival | 3952 (10 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH |
HR 0.78 (0.73 to 0.84) [Survival] |
12 month | |
400 per 1000 | 89 more per 1000 (63 more to 112 more) |
||||
Objective Response Rate | 3952 (10 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a |
RR 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10) |
601 per 1000 | 24 more per 1000 (12 fewer to 60 more) |
Duration of Response | 2884 (6 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a |
- | The median duration of Response was 3.7 months | MD 0.09 months higher (0.13 lower to 0.32 higher) |
Grade 1–4 AE | 2719 (7 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE b |
RR 1.03 (1.01 to 1.06) |
881 per 1000 | 26 more per 1000 (9 more to 53 more) |
Grade 1–4 AE: PD-1/PD-L1 | 1637 (4 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH |
RR 1.02 (1.00 to 1.03) |
965 per 1000 | 19 more per 1000 (0 fewer to 29 more) |
Grade 1–4 AE: CTLA-4 | 1082 (3 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁⨁ HIGH |
RR 1.07 (1.00 to 1.13) |
771 per 1000 | 54 more per 1000 (0 fewer to 100 more) |
Grade 3–4 AE | 2719 (9 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a |
RR 1.06 (1.00 to 1.12) |
557 per 1000 | 33 more per 1000 (0 fewer to 72 more) |
Grade 5 AE | 2736 (6 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 1.71 (0.90 to 3.25) |
12 per 1000 | 9 more per 1000 (1 fewer to 27 more) |
Grade 1–4 Anemia | 1499 (5 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a |
RR 0.98 (0.88 to 1.09) |
458 per 1000 | 9 fewer per 1000 (55 fewer to 41 more) |
Grade 3–4 Anemia | 1644 (6 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 0.88 (0.69 to 1.12) |
149 per 1000 | 18 fewer per 1000 (46 fewer to 18 more) |
Grade 1–4 Thrombocytopenia | 1499 (5 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 1.01 (0.85 to 1.21) |
218 per 1000 | 2 more per 1000 (33 fewer to 46 more) |
Grade 3–4 Thrombocytopenia | 1688 (6 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 1.05 (0.79 to 1.41) |
93 per 1000 | 5 more per 1000 (19 fewer to 38 more) |
Grade 1–4 Neutropenia | 1499 (5 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a |
RR 1.01 (0.90 to 1.13) |
451 per 1000 | 5 more per 1000 (45 fewer to 59 more) |
Grade 3–4 Neutropenia | 1688 (6 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a |
RR 0.93 (0.81 to 1.07) |
313 per 1000 | 22 fewer per 1000 (60 fewer to 22 more) |
Grade 3–4 Febrile Neutropenia | 1070 (3 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 0.74 (0.44 to 1.24) |
60 per 1000 | 16 fewer per 1000 (34 fewer to 14 more) |
Grade 1–4 Fatigue | 1499 (5 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 1.06 (0.88 to 1.28) |
213 per 1000 | 13 more per 1000 (26 fewer to 60 more) |
Grade 3–4 Fatigue | 1644 (6 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 1.68 (0.91 to 3.10) |
19 per 1000 | 13 more per 1000 (2 fewer to 39 more) |
Grade 1–4 Nausea | 1521 (5 RCTs) |
⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE a |
RR 1.01 (0.88 to 1.16) |
337 per 1000 | 3 more per 1000 (40 fewer to 54 more) |
Grade 3–4 Nausea | 1543 (5 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 0.42 (0.15 to 1.19) |
14 per 1000 | 8 fewer per 1000 (12 fewer to 3 more) |
Grade 1–4 Vomiting | 1371 (3 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 0.96 (0.75 to 1.23) |
155 per 1000 | 6 fewer per 1000 (39 fewer to 36 more) |
Grade 3–4 Vomiting | 1374 (3 RCTs) |
⨁⨁◯◯ LOW c |
RR 0.42 (0.14 to 1.28) |
15 per 1000 | 8 fewer per 1000 (13 fewer to 4 more) |
HRQoL | (2 RCTs) | - | |||
The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard Ratio; RR: Risk ratio; MD: Mean difference | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |