Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 30;13(6):2207–2216. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac087

TABLE 2.

Quality of evidence of associations between dietary factors and esophageal cancer risk1

First author (reference) Dietary factor Comparison MA metric Random effect size (95% CI) P I 2, % Largest study, 95% CI 95% prediction interval Egger's P value Excess significance test Evidence class2
O/E P
Miyazaki, 2017 (23) Alcohol cessation Quit drinking vs. current drinking RR 0.57 (0.27, 1.17) 0.12 36.1 0.33–2.6 NE NA 1/0.7 0.58 No
Choi, 2013 (24) Red meat Highest vs. lowest RR 1.28 (1.07, 1.53) 0.008 35.5 1.11–1.69 0.93–1.75 NA 2/1.6 0.51 IV
Han, 2013 (25) Fish Highest vs. lowest RR 0.84 (0.65, 1.09) 0.19 36.1 0.72–1.26 0.36–1.99 NA 1/0.8 0.59 No
Salehi, 2013 (26) Total meat Highest vs. lowest RR 0.92 (0.58, 1.44) 0.7 63.5 0.62–0.86 0.006–148.5 NA 1/1 NP5 No
White meat Highest vs lowest RR 0.8 (0.64, 1.0) 0.051 0 0.65–1.09 NE NA 0/0.6 NP No
Jiang, 2016 (27) Poultry Highest vs. lowest RR 1.03 (0.62, 1.73) 0.91 66.2 0.72–1.26 0.001–385 NA 0/1 NP No
Vingeliene, 2016 (28) Citrus fruits Per 100-g/d increment RR 0.9 (0.79, 1.02) 0.1 0 0.78–1.25 0.76–1.05 NA 1/0.7 0.53 No
Yan, 2018 (29) Pickled vegetables Highest vs. lowest OR 1.04 (0.93, 1.15) 0.53 0 0.92–1.15 NE NA 0/0.1 NP No
Zhang, 2020 (30) Whole grains Highest vs. lowest RR 0.54 (0.38, 0.76) 0.0004 0 0.34–0.82 NE NA 2/1.4 0.46 IV
Sakai, 2021 (31) Fruits Highest vs. lowest RR 0.75 (0.6, 0.92) 0.01 80.9 0.7–0.91 0.39–1.45 NA 3/2.8 0.62 IV
Vingeliene, 2017 (32) Vegetables Per 100-g/d increment RR 0.93 (0.86, 1.01) 0.07 33.7 0.93–1.1 0.77–1.13 NA 1/1.8 NP No
Green leafy vegetables Per 50-g/d increment RR 0.86 (0.78, 0.95) 0.004 0 0.74–0.97 0.74–0.99 NA 1/1.3 NP IV
Processed meat Per 50-g/d increment RR 1.35 (1.06, 1.74) 0.02 56.5 0.87–1.36 0.66–2.78 NA 2/2.3 0.75 IV
Coffee Per 1-cup/d increment RR 0.99 (0.94, 1.03) 0.56 30.6 0.91–1.05 0.92–1.06 NA 0/0.3 NP No
Alcohol Per 10-g/d increment RR 1.21 (1.13, 1.31) <10–6 95.4 1.35–1.6 0.93–1.57 0.004 8/7.8 0.61 II
Li, 2016 (33) Milk Highest vs. lowest RR 0.8 (0.48, 1.33) 0.39 62.7 0.71–1.41 NE NA 0/0.7 NP No
Yi, 2020 (34) Green tea Highest vs. lowest RR 0.75 (0.61, 0.93) 0.007 23.4 0.51–1.08 0.48–1.19 NA 1/1.1 0.73 IV
He, 2017 (35) Total fat Highest vs. lowest RR 0.93 (0.64, 1.34) 0.69 0 0.6–1.42 NE NA 0/0.1 NP No
Saturated fat Highest vs. lowest RR 1.17 (0.88, 1.56) 0.27 0 0.91–1.78 NE NA 0/0.2 NP No
Polyunsaturated fat Highest vs. lowest RR 0.97 (0.77, 1.22) 0.79 0 0.7–1.19 NE NA 0/0.1 NP No
Monounsaturated fat Highest vs. lowest RR 1.28 (0.96, 1.71) 0.1 0 0.84–1.66 NE NA 0/0.4 NP No
Hong, 2016 (36) Selenium Highest vs. lowest RR 0.99 (0.55, 1.78) 0.96 32.6 0.41–1.4 NE NA 0/0.2 NP No
Xie, 2016 (37) Nitrate Highest vs lowest RR 1.06 (0.82, 1.39) 0.65 0 0.75–1.61 0.73–1.55 NA 0/0.3 NP No
Nitrite Highest vs. lowest RR 1.1 (0.92, 1.32) 0.31 11.5 0.84–1.68 0.87–1.39 NA 0/0.5 NP No
Li, 2017 (38) Calcium Highest vs. lowest OR 0.67 (0.54, 0.84) 0.0004 23.7 0.56–1.26 0.16–2.84 NA 2/1.6 0.53 III
Liu, 2017 (39) Folate Highest vs. lowest OR 0.85 (0.64, 1.14) 0.27 48.6 0.61–1.08 0.05–15.28 NA 0/0.7 NP No
Ma, 2018 (40) Iron Highest vs. lowest OR 1.15 (0.89, 1.47) 0.28 56.7 0.99–2.17 0.56–2.34 NA 1/1.6 NP No
Copper Per 1-mg/d increment OR 1.02 (0.64, 1.62) 0.93 95.7 1.2–1.37 NE NA 2/1.4 0.5 No
Zinc Per 5-mg/d increment OR 0.78 (0.71, 0.86) <0.0001 0 0.7–0.89 NE NA 2/1.7 0.71 IV
Ma, 2018 (41) Vitamin B-6 Highest vs. lowest OR 1.02 (0.7, 1.48) 0.93 51.8 0.76–1.32 0.25–4.2 NA 1/0.7 0.58 No
Vitamin B-12 Highest vs. lowest OR 1.02 (0.82, 1.25) 0.89 0 0.8–1.35 0.64–1.61 NA 0/0.2 NP No
Banda 2020 (42) Sodium Highest vs. lowest OR 1.04 (0.99, 1.08) 0.06 0 0.98–1.07 0.81–1.33 NA 0/0.6 NP No
1

MA, meta-analyses; NA, not applicable because number of studies (<10) too small to test for small study effects; NE, not estimated because number of studies (<3) too small to test for 95% prediction interval; NP, not pertinent because estimated number is larger than observed; O/E, observed/expected number of studies with significant results.

2

Evidence class—class I (convincing): statistical significance at P < 10−6, >1000 cases, the largest component study with a significant effect (P < 0.05), the 95% prediction interval excluded the null, no large heterogeneity (I2 < 50%), no small-study effects (P > 0.10), and no excess significance bias (P > 0.10); class II (highly suggestive): significance at P < 10−6, >1000 cases, the largest component study with a significant effect (P < 0.05); class III (suggestive): statistical significance at P < 10−3, >1000 cases; class IV (weak): the remaining significant associations at P < 0.05; No, nonsignificant association P ≥ 0.05.