Table A5.

A report of different experiments using uniform initial condition and no-flux boundary condition.

Source	Location, Max Magnitude	C at $\mathit{t}=200$, (Relative Difference in C)	V, (Relative Difference in Relevant ${\mathit{X}}_{\mathit{i}}$), and Others
Gaussian for M, (case Section 3.4)	In the middle, $0.1$	Profile I, ($20\%$)	$V=6.70V_0$, ($300\%$)
Gaussian for C	In the middle, $0.1$	-	Nonlinear solver collapsed at $t=7.5$
Gaussian for C	In the middle, $0.01$	-	Nonlinear solver collapsed at $t=27.5$
Gaussian for $T_c$, (case Section 3.5)	In the middle, 10	$C\in [1.1,1.4]$, profile II	$V=4.87V_0$, ($20\%$), profile I
Gaussian for $M_n$	In the middle, $-4$	-	Nonlinear solver collapsed at $t=70$
Step function for $T_c$	On the boundary, 1	Profile I, (<$5\%$)	$V=5.29V_0$, $T_c\in [1.3,1.4]$, more on the boundary
Step function for $T_c$, (case Section 3.6)	On the boundary, 4	Profile I, ($10\%$)	$V=4.75V_0$, $T_c\in [1.3,1.7]$, more on the boundary
Step function for $T_h$	On the boundary, 1	$C=1.573$, (<$1\%$)	$V=5.57V_0$, $T_h$ is more on the boundary, ($8\%$)
Step function for M	On the boundary, 1	$C\in [0.88,1.1]$, profile II	$V=34.4V_0$, $M\in [5.5,25]$, more on the boundary
Step function for M,       (case Section 3.7)	On the boundary, $0.1$	$C\in [0.23,0.27]$, profile II	$V=8.88V_0$, $M\in [1.3,3.3]$, more on the boundary