Table 6.
Result of applying models with full features and selected features for the Cleveland dataset.
Approaches | Models | Features | Matrix Performance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACC | PRE | REC | F1 | |||
Regular ML approach | RF | Full features | 86.34 | 86.34 | 86.34 | 86.34 |
Selected features | 82.93 | 82.99 | 82.93 | 82.91 | ||
LR | Full features | 67.32 | 67.43 | 67.3 | 67.18 | |
Selected features | 73.17 | 73.19 | 73.17 | 73.14 | ||
DT | Full features | 82.44 | 82.46 | 82.44 | 82.44 | |
Selected features | 81.95 | 82.01 | 81.95 | 81.93 | ||
NB | Full features | 60.00 | 60.05 | 60.00 | 59.74 | |
Selected features | 64.88 | 64.90 | 64.88 | 64.88 | ||
KNN | Full features | 60.00 | 60.25 | 60.00 | 59.92 | |
Selected features | 66.34 | 66.62 | 66.34 | 66.29 | ||
The hybrid models | CNN-LSTM | Full features | 89.76 | 89.96 | 89.76 | 89.75 |
Selected features | 86.34 | 86.41 | 86.34 | 86.34 | ||
CNN-GRU | Full features | 88.29 | 89.06 | 88.29 | 88.26 | |
Selected features | 85.85 | 86.92 | 85.85 | 85.78 | ||
The proposed model | Stacking SVM | Full features | 97.17 | 97.42 | 97.17 | 97.15 |
Selected features | 91.22 | 91.29 | 91.22 | 91.22 |