In vitro studies |
Dawoud et al.,63 2020, India |
Clinical isolates N = 210 |
NR |
|
Resistance to faropenem and imipenem, respectively
|
Gandra et al.,66 2020, USA |
US CDC isolate bank N = 4 |
NR |
Faropenem
Imipenem
Meropenem
Doripenem
Ertapenem
|
In vitro development of resistance to faropenem, change in MIC (mg/L)MIC range (mg/L) for imipenem; meropenem; doripenem; ertapenem
|
Karlowsky et al.,60 2019, Canada |
Clinical isolates N = 539 |
NR |
|
MIC range (mg/L)MIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)
|
Nakamura et al.,64 2014, Japan |
Clinical isolates N = 210 |
NR |
|
Rate of resistance (%) to faropenembMIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)
|
Hu et al.,68 2014, USA |
Clinical isolates N = 135 |
NR |
Faropenem
Imipenem
Meropenem
Ertapenem
Tebipenem
|
Mean (range) inhibition zone diameter (mm) for faropenem; imipenem; meropenem; ertapenem; tebipenem K. pneumoniae carbapenemase positive:
E. coli: 6 (6); 16 (12–20); 15 (10–21); 13 (6–20); 16 (8–22)
K. pneumoniae: 6 (6); 11 (6–22); 9 (6–20); 8 (6–16); 10 (6–21)
Enterobacter spp.: 6 (6); 15 (7–23); 14 (7–20); 12 (6–17); 16 (7–22)
K. pneumoniae carbapenemase negative:
E. coli: 19 (10–24); 26 (22–30); 26 (25–30); 26 (22–30); 28 (26–32)
K. pneumoniae: 19 (12–23); 26 (23–30); 26 (19–30); 26 (13–28); 28 (20–30)
Enterobacter spp.: 16.5 (10–22); 23 (19–25); 25.5 (16–28); 24.5 (14–28); 27 (19–29)
Zone diameter of 6 mm, for faropenem as a predictor of carbapenemase activity: 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity |
Day et al.,67 2013, International |
Clinical isolates N = 453 (N = 248 part 1, N = 205 part 2) |
NR |
Faropenem
Imipenem
Meropenem
Doripenem
Ertapenem
|
Enterobacterales included in disc susceptibility testing:E. coli, Klebsiella spp., Enterobacter spp., Citrobacter spp., P. mirabilis, Providencia rettgeri and Salmonella spp. (all β-lactamase-producing) Mean (range) inhibition zone diameter (mm) for faropenem; imipenem; meropenem; doripenem; ertapenemZone diameter of 6 mm for faropenem as a predictor of carbapenemase activity
|
Mushtaq et al.,56 2007, UK |
Clinical isolates N = 847 |
NR |
|
MIC range (mg/L) for faropenem and imipenem, respectively
E. coli CTX-M ESBL: 0.5–8 and 0.06–1
E. coli non-CTX-M ESBL: 0.25–8 and 0.06–0.5
E. coli AmpC: 0.5–16 and 0.06–0.5
Klebsiella spp. CTX-M ESBL: 0.12–16 and 0.12–2
Klebsiella spp. non-CTX-M ESBL: 0.12–16 and 0.12–2
Klebsiella oxytoca hyperproducing K1 enzyme: 0.25–1 and 0.12–0.5
Enterobacter spp. CTX-M ESBL: 1–8 and 0.12–1
Enterobacter spp. non-CTX-M ESBL: 1–16 and 0.06–1
Enterobacter spp. AmpC-derepressed: 0.5–16 and 0.12–2
Citrobacter spp. CTX-M ESBL: 2 and 0.25–0.5
Citrobacter spp. non-CTX-M ESBL: 0.5–1 and 0.12–1
Citrobacter spp. AmpC-derepressed: 0.5–8 and 0.25–1
Serratia spp. non-CTX-M ESBL: 1–2 and 0.25–0.5
Serratia spp. AmpC-derepressed: 4–16 and 0.12–2
M. morganii. AmpC-derepressed: 0.5–16 and 1–4
(All cephalosporin resistant) |
Piddock et al.,57 2003, UK |
Clinical isolates N = 170 |
NR |
|
MIC range (mg/L) for faropenem and imipenem, respectively Ciprofloxacin-resistant E. coli: <0.06–0.5 and 0.125–0.125 MIC50 (mg/L) for faropenem and imipenem, respectively
S. pneumoniae: <0.06 and <0.008
S. aureus: <0.006 and 1
Enterococcus spp.b: 16 and 64
E. coli: 0.125 and 0.125
S. typhimurium: 0.125 and 0.25
P. aeruginosa: 64 and 1
Bacteroides fragilis: 0.5 and <0.125
C. jejuni: 0.25 and 0.12
MIC90 (mg/L) for faropenem and imipenem, respectively
S. pneumoniae: 0.5 and 0.25
S. aureus: 16 and 4
Enterococcus spp.c: >32 and 128
E. coli: 0.25 and 0.125
S. typhimurium: 0.25 and 0.5
P. aeruginosa: 128 and 8
B. fragilis: 8 and 4
C. jejuni: 0.25 and 0.25
|
Miyazaki et al.,58 2001, Japan |
Clinical isolates N = 483 |
NR |
|
MIC range (mg/L) for L-036; faropenem; imipenemMIC50 (mg/L) for L-036; faropenem; imipenemMIC90 (mg/L), for L-036, faropenem, imipenemMIC (mg/mL) in vivo in mice, for L-084 (prodrug) and faropenem, respectively
|
Okuda et al.,59 2000, Japan |
Standard strains and clinical isolates N = 758 |
NR |
Faropenem
DU-6681a
R-95867
|
MIC range (mg/L) for faropenem; DU-6681a; R-95856
E. coli: 0.12–2; ≤0.008–0.03; ≤0.008–0.06
K. pneumoniae: 0.25 to >128; ≤0.008–2; 0.015–4
S. marcescens: 2–128; 0.03–32; 0.06–32
Enterobacter spp.: 0.25–8; 0.015–0.25; 0.03–2
C. freundii: 1–4; 0.015–0.06; 0.03–0.5
Proteus spp.: 0.5–8; 0.03–0.5; 0.03–0.5
M. morganii: 1–8; 0.06–0.5; 0.06–1
Shigella spp.: 0.25–1; ≤0.008–0.03; 0.015–0.06
MIC50 (mg/L) for faropenem; DU-6881a;R-95856
E. coli: 1; ≤0.008; 0.015
K. pneumoniae: 0.5; 0.015; 0.015
S. marcescens: 8; 0.12; 0.5
Enterobacter spp.: 2–4; 0.03; 0.25
C. freundii: 2; 0.03; 0.12
Proteus spp.: 2; 0.06–0.12; 0.12
M. morganii: 2; 0.25; 0.5
MIC90 (mg/L) for faropenem; DU-6881a; R-95856
E. coli: 1; 0.015; 0.03
K. pneumoniae: 1; 0.06; 0.06
S. marcescens: 32; 0.25; 2
Enterobacter spp.: 4–8; 0.12; 0.5–2
C. freundii: 4; 0.06, 0.5
Proteus spp.: 4–8; 0.25–0.5; 0.25–0.5
M. morganii: 8, 0.25, 1
|
Arcamone et al.,65 2000, Italy |
NR |
NR |
|
General findingsCiting other sources, MEN 10700 showed good to excellent activity against most Enterobacterales, and had a spectrum of activity similar to ritipenem and faropenem, but with higher activity on Enterobacter and Citrobacter species Stability (after 190 min incubation at 37°C), MEN 10700 and ritipenem, respectivelyAUC (mg/L × min) in vivo in rats, for MEN 11505 (prodrug) and ritipenem acoxil (prodrug), respectivelyRelative bioavailability in vivo in rats, for MEN 11505 (prodrug) and ritipenem acoxil (prodrug), respectively
|
Woodcock et al.,55 1997, UK |
Standard strains and clinical isolates N = 726 |
NR |
|
MIC range (mg/L)MIC50 (mg/L)
E. coli: 0.5
Klebsiella spp.: 0.5
Proteus spp.: 1
M. morganii: 1
Serratia spp.: 2
Enterobacter spp.: 2
Citrobacter spp.: 0.5
Salmonella spp.: 0.5
Shigella spp.: 0.5
P. stuartii: 1
MIC90 (mg/L)
E. coli: 1
Klebsiella spp.: 2
Proteus spp.: 2–4
M. morganii: 2
Serratia spp.: 32
Enterobacter spp.: 4
Citrobacter spp.: 4
Salmonella spp.: 0.5
Shigella spp.: 0.5
P. stuartii: 2
|
Hamilton-Miller et al.,61 1997, UK |
Clinical isolates N = 539 |
NR |
|
MIC range (mg/L) for MEN 10 700 and ritipenem, respectively
E. coli: 0.25–1 and 1
K. pneumoniae: 0.5–1 and 1–2
Enterobacter spp.: 0.5–4 and 1–32
C. freundii: 0.5–4 and 4–32
P. mirabilis: 4–8 and 4–32
M. morganii: 1–16 and 4–16
S. marcescens: 0.5–8 and 4–16
Providencia spp.: 1–16 and 1–32
MIC50 (mg/L) for MEN 10 700 and ritipenem, respectivelyMIC90 (mg/L) for MEN 10 700 and ritipenem, respectively
|
Frean et al.,62 1996, Namibia |
Clinical isolates N = 100 |
Plague |
|
MIC range (mg/L)MIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)
|
In vitro surveillance studies |
Yanagihara et al.,72 2020, Japan |
Clinical isolates N = 1062 |
Respiratory infections |
Faropenem
Imipenem
Meropenem
Doripenem
Biapenem
Panipenem
|
MIC range (mg/L) for faropenem; imipenem; meropenem; doripenem; biapenem; panipenemMIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)
|
Watanabe et al.,71 2012, Japan |
Clinical isolates N = 684 |
Respiratory infections |
Faropenem
Imipenem
Meropenem
Doripenem
Biapenem
Panipenem
|
MIC range (mg/L) for faropenem; imipenem; meropenem; doripenem; biapenem; panipenemMIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)
|
Niki et al.,69 2011, Japan |
Clinical isolates N = 1097 |
Respiratory infections |
Faropenem
Imipenem
Meropenem
Doripenem
Biapenem
Panipenem
|
MIC range (mg/L) for faropenem; imipenem; meropenem; doripenem; biapenem; panipenemMIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)
|
Niki et al.,70 2009, Japan |
Clinical isolates N = 1178 |
Respiratory infections |
Faropenem
Imipenem
Meropenem
Doripenem
Biapenem
Panipenem
|
MIC range (mg/L) for faropenem; imipenem; meropenem; doripenem; biapenem; panipenemMIC50 (mg/L)MIC90 (mg/L)
|