Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 8;11(24):3968. doi: 10.3390/foods11243968

Table 3.

Average CVCi of the SFLQ-Br based on judge’s rates.

Item 1st Version SFLQ-Br 2nd Version SFLQ-Br
Clarity Practical Relevance Theoretical Relevance Clarity Practical Relevance Theoretical Relevance
#1 0.90 0.98 1.00 - - -
#2 0.78 0.84 0.90 0.96 0.98 0.98
#2a - - - 0.90 0.96 0.96
#2b - - - 0.98 1.00 1.00
#2c - - - 0.94 0.96 0.92
#2d - - - 0.98 1.00 1.00
#2e - - - 0.96 0.92 0.84
#3 0.86 1.00 0.98 - - -
#4 0.94 0.82 0.88 - - -
#5 0.98 0.88 0.88 - - -
#6 0.80 0.86 0.86 - - -
#7 0.90 0.80 0.78 0.92 0.92 0.88
#8 0.88 0.94 0.92 - - -
#9 0.82 0.94 0.96 - - -
#10 0.82 0.98 1.00 - - -
#11 0.90 0.92 0.94 - - -
#12 0.90 1.00 1.00 - - -
Average CVC 0.87 0.91 0.92 - - -

Bold values = values below the 0.80 threshold; dashed cells = not evaluated.