Table 2.
Ablation analysis of our network on the FUSCC dataset. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard Index (JA), and Hausdorff distance (95%) (HD95) in test results are displayed in the form of mean ± standard deviation (SD) (95% confidence interval), and the best results are reported in bold. (w/o W): with CM and without loss strategy for weighted pixels located at edges; *: with CM module and loss strategy for weighted pixels located at edges. ↑: larger is better, ↓: smaller is better.
| Index | Model | DSC↑ | JA↑ | HD95↓ | SE↑ | SP↑ | Sm↑ | Em↑ | MAE↓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (a) | backbone | 0.459 ± 0.011 |
0.298 ± 0.009 |
34.703 ± 3.417 |
0.558 | 0.889 | 0.739 | 0.719 | 0.178 |
| (b) | (a) +MF | 0.659 ± 0.010 |
0.491 ± 0.011 |
26.286 ± 2.303 |
0.720 | 0.907 | 0.825 | 0.876 | 0.101 |
| (c) | (b) +MD | 0.791 ± 0.003 |
0.654 ± 0.004 |
8.389 ± 1.228 |
0.854 | 0.958 | 0.875 | 0.908 | 0.076 |
| (d) | (c) +CM (w/o W) | 0.859 ± 0.001 |
0.753 ± 0.001 |
6.119 ± 0.388 |
0.864 | 0.978 | 0.910 | 0.952 | 0.034 |
| (e) | (c) +CM * (ours) |
0.868 ± 0.001 |
0.767 ± 0.002 |
5.354 ± 0.389 |
0.884 | 0.987 | 0.919 | 0.962 | 0.026 |