Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16534. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416534

Table A1.

Descriptive comparison of per-protocol and intention-to-treat data set.

Variable Per-Protocol (N = 144) Intention-to-Treat (N = 303)
Age, M (SD) 50.0 (6.3) 50.4 (6.3)
Gender
  Female, n (%) 43 (29.9) 83 (27.4)
  Male, n (%) 101 (70.1) 220 (72.6)
Relationship status
  Relationship, n (%) 106 (73.6) 220 (72.6)
  Single, n (%) 38 (26.4) 83 (27.4)
Education
  Tertiary, n (%) 87 (60.4) 186 (61.4)
  Secondary, n (%) 54 (37.5) 108 (35.6)
  Primary, n (%) 3 (2.1) 13 (4.3)
Food Literacy, M (SD) 37.4 (5.8) 37.3 (6.0)
  T0, M (SD) 33.0 (5.9) 32.6 (6.3)
  T1, M (SD) 38.6 (4.6) 38.4 (4.6)
  T2, M (SD) 39.4 (5.1) 39.4 (5.0)
  T3, M (SD) 38.8 (5.2) 38.7 (5.4)
Dietary Intake, M (SD) 15.9 (3.8) 15.5 (3.3)
  T0, M (SD) 13.7 (3.3) 13.6 (8.4)
  T1, M (SD) 19.3 (2.7) 18.5 (2.8)
  T2, M (SD) 15.4 (3.4) 14.9 (2.7)
  T3, M (SD) 15.3 (3.4) 14.7 (3.1)

Notes: N = total sample; n = sub-sample; M = mean; SD = standard deviation; tertiary = college degree; secondary = vocational training; primary = high school qualification.