Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 16;19(24):16914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416914

Table 3.

Bayesian analysis of the HR–VO2 relationship.

Treadmill Running Cycling
Males Females Males Females
%HRR vs. %VO2max
    Intercept 12.42 ± 2.24 8.44 ± 2.27 9.99 ± 1.87 10.78 ± 2.02
    Credible interval (8.00, 16.88) (3.98, 12.96) (6.29, 13.64) (6.78, 14.80)
    Slope 0.876 ± 0.023 * 0.943 ± 0.024 * 0.912 ± 0.018 0.931 ± 0.021
    Credible interval (0.831, 0.921) (0.895, 0.990) (0.876, 0.947) (0.890, 0.973)
%HRR vs. %VO2Res
    Intercept 18.26 ± 2.09 15.38 ± 2.11 16.38 ± 1.83 18.06 ± 1.9
    Credible interval (14.02, 22.4) (11.2, 19.54) (12.78, 20.0) (14.19, 21.92)
    Slope 0.818 ± 0.021 * 0.873 ± 0.023 * 0.849 ± 0.017 0.858 ± 0.019
    Credible interval (0.777, 0.858) (0.828, 0.918) (0.815, 0.884) (0.821, 0.896)

Values are intercepts and slopes ± SD (Credible interval). * = Significant sex difference in slopes within the mode of exercise (probability that the slope for females is greater than the slope for males is >95%).