. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416546

Table A2.

Relationships between study variables.

Variable	M	SD	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
1. Gender ^a	/	/	—
2. Residency Level ^b	/	/	0.024	—
3. Commun. (channels) ^b	/	/	0.153 **	0.180 **	—
4. Commun. (partners, job-rel.) ^b	/	/	0.072	0.151 **	0.583 **	—
5. Organization ^b	/	/	0.122 *	0.058	0.467 **	0.323 **	—
6. Docum. & Monitoring ^b	/	/	0.072	0.065	0.469 **	0.405 **	0.341 **	—
7. Diagn. & Therap. Dec. Supp. ^b	/	/	0.103	−0.108 *	0.337 **	0.317 **	0.496 **	0.431 **	—
8. Knowl. Acq. & Training ^b	/	/	0.194 **	0.039	0.376 **	0.373 **	0.492 **	0.386 **	0.635 **	—
9. Social Support (Colleagues)	4.19	0.67	−0.011	−0.057	0.007	0.016	0.051	−0.085	−0.021	0.037	—
10. Social Support (Supervisor)	3.53	0.98	0.086	−0.053	−0.022	0.053	0.049	−0.065	0.014	0.068	0.532 *	—
11. ATI	3.78	1.15	0.407 **	0.018	0.063	0.023	0.211 **	0.062	0.085	0.208 **	−0.031	−0.014	—
12. Inform. sec.-rel. Commun.	2.69	0.88	0.090	0.110	0.027	−0.026	0.057	−0.040	−0.075	−0.055	0.137 *	0.192 **	−0.013	—
13. Inform. sec.-rel. Compliance	3.56	0.72	−0.037	0.035	−0.155 **	−0.105	0.097	−0.189 **	−0.014	−0.005	0.131 *	0.193 **	0.085	0.292* *	—
14. App Selection ^c	3.49	0.85	0.049	0.146 *	−0.002	0.081	0.125 *	−0.088	0.062	0.077	0.045	0.191 **	0.224 **	0.167 **	0.348 **	—

^a Female = 1, Male = 2. N = 342. ^b Ordinal data. Therefore, Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient was used. ^c Only respondents who had experience with such apps were included. N = 302. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. All statistically significant correlations are highlighted in grey.