Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;19(24):16546. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192416546

Table A2.

Relationships between study variables.

Variable M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
  • 1.

    Gender a

/ /
  • 2.

    Residency Level b

/ / 0.024
  • 3.

    Commun. (channels) b

/ / 0.153 ** 0.180 **
  • 4.

    Commun. (partners, job-rel.) b

/ / 0.072 0.151 ** 0.583 **
  • 5.

    Organization b

/ / 0.122 * 0.058 0.467 ** 0.323 **
  • 6.

    Docum. & Monitoring b

/ / 0.072 0.065 0.469 ** 0.405 ** 0.341 **
  • 7.

    Diagn. & Therap. Dec. Supp. b

/ / 0.103 −0.108 * 0.337 ** 0.317 ** 0.496 ** 0.431 **
  • 8.

    Knowl. Acq. & Training b

/ / 0.194 ** 0.039 0.376 ** 0.373 ** 0.492 ** 0.386 ** 0.635 **
  • 9.

    Social Support (Colleagues)

4.19 0.67 −0.011 −0.057 0.007 0.016 0.051 −0.085 −0.021 0.037
  • 10.

    Social Support (Supervisor)

3.53 0.98 0.086 −0.053 −0.022 0.053 0.049 −0.065 0.014 0.068 0.532 *
  • 11.

    ATI

3.78 1.15 0.407 ** 0.018 0.063 0.023 0.211 ** 0.062 0.085 0.208 ** −0.031 −0.014
  • 12.

    Inform. sec.-rel. Commun.

2.69 0.88 0.090 0.110 0.027 −0.026 0.057 −0.040 −0.075 −0.055 0.137 * 0.192 ** −0.013
  • 13.

    Inform. sec.-rel. Compliance

3.56 0.72 −0.037 0.035 −0.155 ** −0.105 0.097 −0.189 ** −0.014 −0.005 0.131 * 0.193 ** 0.085 0.292* *
  • 14.

    App Selection c

3.49 0.85 0.049 0.146 * −0.002 0.081 0.125 * −0.088 0.062 0.077 0.045 0.191 ** 0.224 ** 0.167 ** 0.348 **

a Female = 1, Male = 2. N = 342. b Ordinal data. Therefore, Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient was used. c Only respondents who had experience with such apps were included. N = 302. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. All statistically significant correlations are highlighted in grey.