Table 4. Raw data for meta-analysis on improvement in psychiatric illness with the use of psilocybin.

SE = standard error; CI = confidence interval; ID = identification

Study	Events	Sample size	Outcome	SE	CI lower	CI upper	Study ID	Rate	CI lower	CI upper
Carhart-Harris et al. 2016 [26]	19	20	0.95	0.22	0.52	1.34	10	95	42.72	42.72
Carhart-Harris et al. 2017 [17]	19	19	1	0.23	0.55	1.45	9	100	44.97	44.97
Davis et al. 2021 [32]	17	24	0.71	0.17	0.37	1.04	8	70.83	33.67	33.67
Ross et al. 2016 [33]	20.3	29	0.7	0.16	0.39	1.00	7	70	30.45	30.45
Griffiths et al. 2016 [4]	41	51	0.80	0.13	0.56	1.05	6	80.39	24.60	24.61
Larsen et al. 2017 [6]	2	12	0.17	0.12	-0.06	0.39	5	16.67	23.10	23.10
Johnson et al. 2014 [23]	12	15	0.8	0.23	0.35	1.25	4	80	45.26	45.26
Mason et al. 2019 [11]	50	50	1	0.14	0.72	1.28	3	100	27.72	27.72
Stroud et al. 2018 [12]	17	17	1	0.24	0.52	1.48	2	100	47.54	47.54
Summary	197.3	237	0.77	0.11	0.55	0.99	1	76.98	21.68	21.68