Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 30;3:100132. doi: 10.1016/j.crphar.2022.100132

Table 3.

Comparison of binding free energy components estimated from minimized-docked and average-simulated EGFR-TK/cannabinoid complexes.

Energy term Minimized-docked complex
Average simulated complex (30–50 ns)
Average simulated complex (80–100 ns)
CBD CBG CBN CBD CBG CBN CBD CBG CBN
ΔEvdW −190.6 −185.9 −181.3 −135.1 ​± ​11.8 −160.3 ​± ​13.2 −164.6 ​± ​12.9 −126.2 ​± ​11.4 −167.0 ​± ​9.8 −156.7 ​± ​10.6
ΔEelec −19.0 −22.9 −25.0 −13.3 ​± ​4.7 −17.2 ​± ​6.9 −17.2 ​± ​5.6 −10.2 ​± ​3.5 −21.0 ​± ​8.9 −15.1 ​± ​5.2
ΔGpolar 115.5 102.5 126.5 75.6 ​± ​20.7 113.4 ​± ​14.5 110.6 ​± ​15.3 53.3 ​± ​8.8 100.0 ​± ​11.2 105.6 ​± ​15.2
ΔGnonpolar −18.6 −19.9 −18.4 −16.6 ​± ​1.7 −19.5 ​± ​1.1 −19.5 ​± ​1.0 −16.1 ​± ​1.0 −18.5 ​± ​0.9 −19.2 ​± ​1.0
ΔGbind −112.7 −126.1 −98.2 −89.4 ​± ​21.1 −83.5 ​± ​16.1 −90.6 ​± ​17.2 −99.2 ​± ​11.4 −106.5 ​± ​12.6 −85.5 ​± ​12.0

Values are mean ​± ​SD.