Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan;11(1):27–44. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(22)00266-1

Table 2.

Summary of meta-analyses* of vaccine effectiveness for two consecutive seasons' vaccination history and influenza type or subtype

Current season Previous season Current and previous season ΔVEc ΔVEp
A(H1N1)pdm09 58% (48 to 66) 33% (21 to 43) 53% (44 to 60) −9% (−16 to −1) 21% (11 to 30)
A(H3N2) 37% (29 to 45%) 9% (−3 to 19) 20% (12 to 27) −18% (−26 to −11) 7% (−4 to 18)
B 54% (49 to 59) 21% (12 to 29) 47% (41 to 53) −7% (−14 to 0) 25% (16 to 34)
B infection and B/Victoria in TIV 47% (38 to 55) 19% (6 to 31) 45% (35 to 54) −2% (−13 to 9) 26% (11 to 40)
B infection and B/Yamagata in TIV 61% (54 to 67) 23% (11 to 34) 48% (39 to 55) −10% (−19 to −2) 24% (12 to 37)
B-Victoria infection 61% (43 to 73) 31% (0 to 53) 52% (38 to 63) −10% (−31 to 12) 15% (−10 to 41)
B-Yamagata infection 56% (39 to 68) 38% (25 to 49) 52% (42 to 60) −5% (−17 to 6) 14 (0 to 28)

Data are vaccine effectiveness estimates (95% CI). TIV=trivalent influenza vaccine. VE=vaccine effectiveness.

*

Random effect model results shown; for fixed effect estimates refer to the appendix (pp 41–55).

ΔVE>0 implies higher vaccine effective estimate when vaccinated in current and previous seasons compared with the current (VEC) or previous (VEP) season only.