Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2022 Aug 23;44(1):2–9. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001265

Table 3.

Regression estimated prevalence ratios and prevalence differences for environmental associations with middle ear disease1

Variable Sample prevalence Number of observations used2 Prevalence ratio3 (95% CI) Prevalence difference4 (95% CI)
How many people currently live in the household? 1564 1.05 (0.99,1.10) 0.8 (−0.1,1.8)
Do you have running water in your house? 1564
 Water in house 14.5 (12.5,16.8) (ref) (ref)
 No water in house 22.4 (18.8,26.2) 1.53 (1.03,2.27) 7.6 (−0.1,15.4)
Do you use a wood-burning stove or fireplace? 1557
 No 18.0 (15.7,20.6) (ref) (ref)
 Yes 15.5 (12.7,18.7) 0.86 (0.64,1.17) −2.4 (−7.3,2.5)
Number of smokers in the house? 1563
 None 17.3 (14.2,20.8) (ref) (ref)
 1–2 Smokers 16.8 (14.4,19.6) 0.96 (0.57,1.61) −0.5 (−9.5,8.4)
 3 or more smokers 17.5 (12.7,23.4) 1.02 (0.55,1.92) 0.5 (−10.3,11.2)
Count of risk factors5 1556 1.16 (0.90,1.49) 2.5 (−2.0,7.0)
Overall prevalence of middle ear disease 17.4 (15.5,19.3) 1599
1

Presence of middle ear disease was determined by Type B (flat) or Type C tympanogram (<−200 daPa) or positive findings on otoscopy.

2

Number of observations used for regression analysis

3

Estimated using modified Poisson with generalized estimating equations with clustering at the community level (n=15) and small sample correction, adjusted for age, sex, and Alaska Native race.

4

Estimated using generalized estimating equations with normal distribution and identity linking, accounting for clustering at the community level (n=15) and small sample correction, adjusted for age, sex, and Alaska Native race.

5

Count of binary indicators for lack of water, wood burning stove/fireplace, and 3+smokers in house (range 0–3)