Table 3.
The catalytic performance comparison of Fe3O4@Glycerol-Cu with past research.
Entry | Catalyst | Solvent | Time (min) | Yield (%) | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | L-proline | EtOH | 95 | 92 | 36 |
2 | NaOH | EtOH | 240 | 66 | 37 |
3 | (SB-DBU)Cl | EtOH | 25 | 95 | 38 |
4 | Piperidine | EtOH | 120 | 80 | 39 |
5 | DMAP | EtOH | 15 | 94 | 40 |
6 | SB-DABCO | EtOH | 30 | 93 | 41 |
7 | CuSO4.5H2O | H2O | 60 | 95 | 42 |
8 | GO/α-Fe2O3/CuL | Solvent Free | 60 | 98 | 43 |
9 | Fe3O4@Glycerol-Cu | EtOH | 15 | 95 | This research |
Significant values are in bold.