Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 22;5:187. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00738-y

Table 1.

Comparison of clinical features between the EF recovery group and the no EF recovery group at 1 year after RARP.

Features No EF recovered at 1 year
Median (IQR) / Count (%) (N = 46)
EF recovered at 1 year
Median (IQR) / Count (%) (N = 34)
p-value
Patient factors
 Age, year 65 (61–69) 61 (58–65) 0.02
 BMI, kg/m2 27.4 (25.9–29.0) 28.7 (25.3–30.1) 0.69
 Pre-op SHIM score 24 (21–25) 24 (22–25) 0.36
 PSA, ng/mL 6.8 (5.4–11.2) 7.7 (5.2–9.8) 0.74
 ASA 0.03
  I 3 (6.5%) 8 (23.5%)
  ≥II 43 (93.5%) 26 (76.5%)
 Pre-op Gleason score 0.22
  6 (ISUP 1) 12 (26.1%) 8 (23.5%)
  7 (ISUP 2/3) 22 (47.8%) 22 (64.7%)
  ≥8 (ISUP 4/5) 12 (26.1%) 4 (11.8%)
 Post-op Gleason score 0.19
  6 (ISUP 1) 4 (8,7%) 6 (17.6%)
  7 (ISUP 2/3) 32 (69.6%) 25 (73.5%)
  ≥8 (ISUP 4/5) 10 (21.7%) 3 (8.8%)
 Pathological tumor stage 0.65
  pT2 22 (47.8%) 18 (52.9%)
  ≥pT3 24 (52.2%) 16 (47.1%)
 Prostate volume, g 48 (34–54) 39 (32–56) 0.35
Treatment factors
 Nerve-sparing extent 0.49
  Partial 14 (30.4%) 8 (23.5%)
  Full 32 (69.6%) 26 (76.5%)

Continuous variables were compared by Mann–Whitney U test and reported as median (IQR). Categorical variables were compared by Chi-square test or Fisher exact test as indicated.

ASA American Society of Anesthesiology physical status classification system, BMI body mass index, IQR interquartile range, SHIM Sexual Health Inventory for Men, ISUP International Society of Urological Pathology, PSA prostate specific antigen.