Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 12.
Published in final edited form as: Risk Anal. 2022 Jun 23;43(4):677–685. doi: 10.1111/risa.13982

Table 2:

Expected detected-event-free period (DEFP) required for 95% and 99% confidence about no circulation (CNCx%) and time of undetected circulation between the last paralytic case and die-out (TUCx%) in Pakistan and Afghanistan assuming perfect and imperfect surveillance (based on 1,000 iterations)

Scenario 1 Scenario 2
POE 100.0% 99.9%
Metric CNCx% TUCx% CNCx% TUCx%
x% 95% 99% 95% 99% 95% 99% 95% 99%
DEFP values assuming perfect AFP surveillance without ES 1.58 2.17 1.49 1.98 1.50 2.08 1.45 2.08
DEFP values assuming worst performing surveillance (worst AFP surveillance sensitivity and no ES) 3.25 3.75 3.19 3.74 2.67 3.25 2.58 3.24
DEFP values assuming best performing surveillance (AFP with best ES sensitivity) 0.25 0.33 0.20 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.18 0.23

Abbreviations: AFP, acute flaccid paralysis; CNCx%, DEFP at which the confidence about no circulation exceeds x%; cVDPV, circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus; DEFP, detected-event-free period; ES, environmental surveillance; PIR, paralysis-to-infection ratio; POE, probability of eradication; TUCx%, time at which the probability of undetected WPV circulation after the true last case becomes exceeds x%; WPV1, serotype 1 wild poliovirus.