Table 2:
Expected detected-event-free period (DEFP) required for 95% and 99% confidence about no circulation (CNCx%) and time of undetected circulation between the last paralytic case and die-out (TUCx%) in Pakistan and Afghanistan assuming perfect and imperfect surveillance (based on 1,000 iterations)
Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POE | 100.0% | 99.9% | ||||||
Metric | CNCx% | TUCx% | CNCx% | TUCx% | ||||
x% | 95% | 99% | 95% | 99% | 95% | 99% | 95% | 99% |
DEFP values assuming perfect AFP surveillance without ES | 1.58 | 2.17 | 1.49 | 1.98 | 1.50 | 2.08 | 1.45 | 2.08 |
DEFP values assuming worst performing surveillance (worst AFP surveillance sensitivity and no ES) | 3.25 | 3.75 | 3.19 | 3.74 | 2.67 | 3.25 | 2.58 | 3.24 |
DEFP values assuming best performing surveillance (AFP with best ES sensitivity) | 0.25 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 0.23 |
Abbreviations: AFP, acute flaccid paralysis; CNCx%, DEFP at which the confidence about no circulation exceeds x%; cVDPV, circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus; DEFP, detected-event-free period; ES, environmental surveillance; PIR, paralysis-to-infection ratio; POE, probability of eradication; TUCx%, time at which the probability of undetected WPV circulation after the true last case becomes exceeds x%; WPV1, serotype 1 wild poliovirus.