Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 19;23(24):16186. doi: 10.3390/ijms232416186

Table 3.

Comparison of adsorption capacity and desorption efficiency for tested MNPs and amino-functionalized MNPs at optimal model solution pH for adsorbing Hg2+ ions.

Adsorbent HM Ions Tested
pH
Adsorption Capacity Desorption Efficiency Reference
NH2-functionalized γ-Fe2O3 NPs (γ-Fe2O3@NH2 NPs) Hg2+ 4.0 16.2 mg/g 100% This work
CT-HPMNPs 5.0 32.88 mg/g ≅85% [92]
Rhodamine-hydrazide-modified Fe3O4 7.5 37.4 mg/g - [93]
Nanocomposite based on Fe3O4 nanoparticles, chitosan nanoparticles, and polythiophene 7.0 50 mg/g - [95]
Fe3O4@SiO2-NH-HCG- (py) 7.0 56 mg/g 95% [96]
Fe3O4 nanoparticle coated with amino organic ligands and yam peel biomass 7.0 60 mg/g - [94]
Fe3O4@SiO2-NH-HCG- (pyd) 7.0 77 mg/g 95% [96]
NH2-functionalized γ-Fe2O3 NPs (γ-Fe2O3@NH2 NPs) 7.0 85.6 mg/g 100% This work
Armeniaca sibirica shell activated carbon (ASSAC) magnetized by nanoparticles (Fe3O4/ASSAC) pH 2 97.1 mg/g [97]
Activated carbon (XLAC) derived from Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge hull pH 5.5 235.6 mg·g [98]
Cadmium sulfide nanoparticles doped in a nanoadsorbent fabricated from polycaprolactam (nylon 6) nanofibers (CdS/N6) pH 5 162 mg g [99]