Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;11(24):7374. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247374

Table A2.

Comparison of PanOptix IOL Visual Outcomes in Published Literature.

PanOptix Study Eyes (n) Int
(mo)
UDVA (logMar) UIVA
(logMar)
UNVA
(logMar)
UDVA ≤ 20/20 (%) UDVA ≤ 20/40 (%) UIVA ≤ 20/20 (%) UIVA ≤ 20/40 (%) UNVA ≤ 20/20 (%) UNVA ≤ 20/40 (%) Funding
Monaco [23], 2017 60 4 0.00 ± 0.04 0.23 ± 0.07 0.02 ± 0.06 - - - - - - N
Garcia-Perez [24], 2017 58 1 0.03 ± 0.05 0.12 ± 0.14 0.02 ± 0.10 - - - - - - N
Kohnen [25], 2017 54 3 0.04 ± 0.13 0.06 ± 0.12 0.06 ± 0.107 57 96 40 100 50 100 N
Lawless [26], 2017 66 1, 2 0.01 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.14 0.18 ± 0.1 78.8 100 - - 50 - N
De Medeiros [3], 2017 20 1–6 0.01 ± 0.04 * 0.14 ± 0.05 * −0.03 ± 0.04 * - - - - - - N
Gundersen and Potvin [27], 2017 120 6–24 −0.05 ± 0.07 * - 0.07 ± 0.07 - - - - - - Y
Vilar [28], 2017 40 1 0.01 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.05 −0.03 ± 0.04 - - - - - - N
Böhm [29], 2018 27 3 0.04 ± 0.13 0.08 ± 0.12 0.06 ± 0.11 - - - - - - Y
Escandón-García [30], 2018 90 1–2 0.07 ± 0.10 * - - - - - - - - Y
Mencucci [31], 2018 120 3 0.01 ± 0.09 0.11 ± 0.04 0.17 ± 0.05 50 100 2 100 0 100 N
Alió [32], 2018 52 6 0.07 ± 0.10 * 0.12 ± 0.13 * 0.16 ± 0.09 * - - - - - - Y
Cochener [33], 2018 120 6 0.87 ± 0.16 d 0.55 ± 0.12 d 0.61 ± 0.11 d 50 95 - - - - N
Martínez de Carneros-Llorente [34], 2019 40 6 0.07 ± 0.10 - - - - - - - - N
Donmez [35], 2019 138 6 0.02 ± 0.05 0.06 ± 0.07 0.05 ± 0.07 - 100 - 100 - 100 N
Yesilirmak [36], 2019 20 6 −0.14 ± 0.05 * 0.03 ± 0.05 * 0.00 ± 0.00 * 100 * 100 * 75 * 100 * 100 * 100 * N
Středová [37], 2019 32 1, 27 0.94 ± 0.10 d - 1.00 ± 0.0 d - - - - - 96.3 N
Rementería-Capelo [18], 2019 (spherical) 166 3 0.06 ± 0.07 0.2 ± 0.1 0.05 ± 0.07 - - - - - - N
Rementería-Capelo [18], 2019 (toric) 84 3 0.07 ± 0.1 0.23 ± 0.2 0.07 ± 0.12 - - - - - - N
De Medeiros [38], 2019 26 6–12 0.09 ± 0.00 * 0.39 ± 0.2 * −0.01 ± 0.16 * - - - - - - Y
Ribeiro [39], 2020 60 3 0.06 ± 0.11 0.05 ± 0.08 0.05 ± 0.10 - - - - - - Y
Nicula [40], 2020 128 12 0.07 ± 0.14 0.08 ± 0.14 0.07 ± 0.14 62.8 - 62.8 - 62 - N
Kim [41], 2020 88 3 0.08 ± 0.12 0.05 ± 0.13 0.09 ± 0.13 52 100 66 100 57 96 Y
Kohnen [42], 2020 50 3 0.02 ± 0.12 0.12 ± 0.11 0.10 ± 0.11 68 100 29 100 32 100 Y
Kohnen [43], 2020 290 12 0.02 ± 0.11 * 0.04 ± 0.12 * 0.07 ± 0.11 * 70 99 51 98 44 97 Y
Song [44], 2020 50 6 0.03 ± 0.08 0.05 ± 0.05 0.08 ± 0.09 - 100 * - 100 * - 100 * Y
Lapid-Gortzak [45], 2020 93 4–6 0.01 ± 0.01 * 0.05 ± 0.13 * 0.08 ± 0.10 * - - - - - - Y
Carreño [46], 2020 200 1 −0.08 * 0.03 * −0.04 * - - - - - - Y
Ribeiro [47], 2020 30 3 0.05 ± 0.09 0.11 ± 0.13 0.05 ± 0.11 - - - - - - N
Serdiuk [48], 2020 28 6 0.33 ± 0.29 d - - 64 100 0 96 11 96 N
Alfonso [49], 2020 80 6 0.85 ± 0.19 - 0.71 ± 0.10 70 * 100 * 0 * 100 * 35 * 100 * N
Pedrotti [50], 2020 50 3 −0.02 ± 0.09 0.12 ± 0.04 0.14 ± 0.045 - - - - - - Y
Doroodgar [51], 2020 62 24, 48 0.02 ± 0.04 * 0.04 ± 0.06 * 0.03 ± 0.05 * - - - - - - N
Rementería-Capelo [52], 2021 72 3 0.04 ± 0.06 0.18 ± 0.13 0.06 ± 0.07 - - - - - - N
Blaylock [53], 2020 137 3 0.04 ± 0.09 −0.07 ± 0.08 0.04 ± 0.07 64.7 100 94.9 99.3 73 100 Y
Moshirfar [14], 2021 113 3 0.09 ± 0.13 - 0.16 ± 0.14 21 100 - - 23 96 N
Choi [54], 2021 50 6 0.04 ± 0.07 - 0.03 ± 0.06 70 100 - - - - Y
Ramamurthy [55], 2021 141 3 0.09 ± 0.14 0.12 ± 0.15 0.14 ± 0.15 53.7 * 100 * 34.8 * 98.5 * 31.8 * 92.4 * Y
Ison [56], 2021 134 1 0.01 ± 0.10 * - 0.14 ± 0.06 * 72 * 100 * - - - - N
Yoo [57], 2021 25 3 0.08 ± 0.14 - 0.05 ± 0.08 - - - - - - Y
Galvis [58], 2022 130 1.5+ 0.04 ± 0.06 * 0.07 ± 0.08 * 0.05 ± 0.08 * 63.1 100 - - - 100 N
Sandoval [59], 2022 56 3 0.04 ± 0.09 0.13 ± 0.10 0.13 ± 0.07 - - - - - - Y
Blaylock [60], 2022 35 3 0.09 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.12 0.05 ± 0.10 28.6 100 77.8 100 65.6 100 Y
Imburgia [61], 2022 32 12 0.01 ± 0.06 0.09 ± 0.05 0.04 ± 0.05 75 - 19 100 56 100 N
FDA Trial [20], 2019 129 6 - - - 44.9 97.6 37 96.9 25.2 95.3 Y
Current Study, 2022 119 6 0.09 ± 0.16 0.02 ± 0.12 0.02 ± 0.07 36 98 4 87 15 85 N

Abbreviations: Int = postoperative follow-up interval; UDVA = uncorrected distance visual acuity; UIVA = uncorrected intermediate visual acuity; UNVA = uncorrected near visual acuity; d = decimal; * = binocular visual acuity (all values are monocular unless otherwise noted). Parameters such as distance-corrected visual acuity were not included, given that the current study did not use these parameters. In all instances, if two distances existed for one parameter, the one closest to the distance used in the current study was recorded in this table. For example, if there were two distances measured for UIVA (80 cm and 60 cm) the 60 cm measurement was used, given that it is closer to the current study’s measurement of UIVA at 66 cm.