. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.

Published in final edited form as: Int J Health Promot Educ. 2020 Dec 29;60(5):262–272. doi: 10.1080/14635240.2020.1866999

Table 3.

REGRESSION ON 6-MONTH CHANGE IN HBA1C (n=296)^*^,^**

Variable	DF	Parameter Estimate	Standard Error	t Value	Pr>\|t\|
Intercept	1	5.27409	0.80404	6.56	<.0001
Age	1	−0.00587	.00768	−0.76	0.4453
Education	1	−0.14184	0.09955	−1.42	0.1553
Health Care Coverage	1	−0.07152	0.10557	0.68	0.4987
Male Gender	1	−0.08558	0.17383	−0.49	0.6229
HbA1c (baseline)	1	−0.49917	0..04050	−12.33	<.0001
Diabetes Worry Score	1	0.00399	0.00505	0.79	0.4295
Diabetes Control Ability Score	1	−0.09585	0.02935	−3.27	0.0012

Cases missing data for one or more of the variables were removed from the data set, resulting in a sample size of 296.

^**

Negative sign indicates improvement in blood sugar.