Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work. 2020 Dec 14;32(1):23–32. doi: 10.1080/15313204.2020.1855496

Table 3.

Effect parameters of own-group neighborhoods to determine arrest charge1 for Asian youth ages 11–20, Los Angeles Probation Department 2000–2009

Violence Weapon Substance

OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)

Own-Group Ethnoburb 0.74 (0.46, 1.17) 1.33 (0.88, 2.03) 1.07 (0.66, 1.73)
Own-Group Ethnic Enclave 0.32 (0.11, 0.94)* 0.89 (0.37, 2.10) 0.39 (0.11, 1.32)
Ethnicity2
 Korean 1.77 (0.94, 3.35) 0.61 (0.29, 1.25) 0.46 (0.18, 1.15)
 Japanese 0.43 (0.12, 1.58) 0.70 (0.28, 1.75) 1.60 (0.68, 3.74)
 Filipino 0.76 (0.46, 1.28) 0.58 (0.36, 0.92)* 0.42 (0.24, 0.73)**
 Southeast Asian 0.76 (0.37, 1.55) 0.49 (0.26, 0.94)* 0.68 (0.31, 1.47)
Arrest Age 0.96 (0.84, 1.10) 0.88 (0.78, 0.99)* 1.41 (1.17, 1.68)***
Male 1.17 (0.75, 1.82) 2.28 (1.43, 3.64)** 1.23 (0.73, 2.08)
Number Charges 1.04 (0.87, 1.25) 0.99 (0.83, 1.18) 1.11 (0.91, 1.36)
Neighborhood Characteristics
 Youth Population (ages 10–19) 1.07 (1.00, 1.16) 1.02 (0.95, 1.09) 1.02 (0.94, 1.11)
 Youth Organization Density 1.83 (0.81, 4.11) 0.64, 0.25, 1.65) 0.63 (0.20, 1.91)

Constant 0.18 (0.02, 2.05) 1.62 (0.17, 14.98) 0.00 (0.00, 0.02)***

Note:

1

Reference=Property

2

Reference=Chinese

***

p < .001

**

p < .01

*

p < .05

p< .10