Table 3.
Effect parameters of own-group neighborhoods to determine arrest charge1 for Asian youth ages 11–20, Los Angeles Probation Department 2000–2009
| Violence | Weapon | Substance | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |
|
| |||
| Own-Group Ethnoburb | 0.74 (0.46, 1.17) | 1.33 (0.88, 2.03) | 1.07 (0.66, 1.73) |
| Own-Group Ethnic Enclave | 0.32 (0.11, 0.94)* | 0.89 (0.37, 2.10) | 0.39 (0.11, 1.32) |
| Ethnicity2 | |||
| Korean | 1.77 (0.94, 3.35) | 0.61 (0.29, 1.25) | 0.46 (0.18, 1.15)† |
| Japanese | 0.43 (0.12, 1.58) | 0.70 (0.28, 1.75) | 1.60 (0.68, 3.74) |
| Filipino | 0.76 (0.46, 1.28) | 0.58 (0.36, 0.92)* | 0.42 (0.24, 0.73)** |
| Southeast Asian | 0.76 (0.37, 1.55) | 0.49 (0.26, 0.94)* | 0.68 (0.31, 1.47) |
| Arrest Age | 0.96 (0.84, 1.10) | 0.88 (0.78, 0.99)* | 1.41 (1.17, 1.68)*** |
| Male | 1.17 (0.75, 1.82) | 2.28 (1.43, 3.64)** | 1.23 (0.73, 2.08) |
| Number Charges | 1.04 (0.87, 1.25) | 0.99 (0.83, 1.18) | 1.11 (0.91, 1.36) |
| Neighborhood Characteristics | |||
| Youth Population (ages 10–19) | 1.07 (1.00, 1.16)† | 1.02 (0.95, 1.09) | 1.02 (0.94, 1.11) |
| Youth Organization Density | 1.83 (0.81, 4.11) | 0.64, 0.25, 1.65) | 0.63 (0.20, 1.91) |
|
| |||
| Constant | 0.18 (0.02, 2.05) | 1.62 (0.17, 14.98) | 0.00 (0.00, 0.02)*** |
Note:
Reference=Property
Reference=Chinese
p < .001
p < .01
p < .05
p< .10