Table 2.
Summary of patient information.
| No. | Age | Sex | Target Region and Procedure | Number of Implants |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67 | F | Lt. SFA + U.ARA | 2 |
| 2 | 64 | M | Lt. SFA | 2 |
| 3 | 43 | F | Bil. SFA | 5 |
| 4 | 63 | M | Bil. SFA | 4 |
| 5 | 60 | F | Bil. SFA | 6 |
| 6 | 44 | F | Bil. SFA | 5 |
| 7 | 64 | M | Bil. SFA | 4 |
| 8 | 38 | M | Bil. SFA | 4 |
| 9 | 23 | F | L. ARA | 2 |
| 10 | 55 | M | Bil. SFA | 6 |
| 11 | 53 | M | Bil. SFA | 5 |
| 12 | 57 | M | Bil. SFA | 5 |
| 13 | 50 | F | U. ARA | 2 |
| 14 | 50 | M | U. ARA | 2 |
| 15 | 38 | F | U. ARA | 2 |
Fifteen patients participated in this study. Sinus floor augmentation (SFA) and/or alveolar ridge augmentation (ARA) were performed in 11 and 5 patients, respectively. Rt, right side; Lt, left side; Bil, bilateral sides; U, upper jaw; L, lower jaw.