Table 1.

An overview of compared gas permeation and pervaporation systems.

	Sada et al. [37] Test Case 2	Chowdhury et al. [38] Test Case 3	Koch et al. [39] Test Case 4
membrane	asymmetric cellulose triacetate hollow fiber (Sample 31)	simulated asymmetric cellulose acetate hollow fiber	Hydrophilic polymeric PERVAPTM 1210
type	gas permeation	gas permeation	pervaporation
flow configuration	counter-current	counter-current	co-current
inner diameter [µm]	0.000125	80	1 membrane area 159.4 cm2
length [cm]	63	15
no. of fibers [-]	270	70
Temperature [K]	303	298	~333 K
feed pressure [bar]	Varied between 15.7–5.9	69.64
feed composition	50.0% CO2 10.5% O2 39.5% N2	51.78% H2 24.69% N2 19.57% CH4 3.96% Ar	23.7 % ACE 65.1 % H2 11.2 % IPA
permeate pressure [mbar]	1013.25	11230
permeance [10−10 mol/s m2Pa]	CO2: 204.2 O2: 60.2 N2: 13.1	H2: 284 N2: 2.95 CH4: 2.84 Ar: 70	variable permeances

¹ Values such as the inner diameter, number of fibers, and the fiber length are not provided by the source of the membrane.