Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 19;11(24):7540. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247540

Table 3.

Differences in treatment for inflammatory bowel disease between cases and controls.

Variable Cases
n = 482
Controls
n = 964
Univariate
p-Value
5ASA, n (%) 204 (42) 332 (34) 0.003
Oral (oral and topic) 125 (26) 180 (19) <0.0001
Topical (exclusive) 6 (1) 18 (1.9) 0.051
Monotherapy 142 (29) 214 (22) 0.9
Systemic steroids, n (%) 26 (5.4) 35 (3.6) 0.06
Immunosuppressants (all), n (%) 319 (66) 611 (63) 0.39
Immunosuppressants (in monotherapy), n (%) 113 (23) 191 (20)
Azathioprine 90 (19) 160 (17)
Mercaptopurine 8 (1.7) 7 (0.7)
Cyclosporine 1 (0.2) 1 (0.1)
Methotrexate 9 (1.9) 11 (1.1)
Tacrolimus 1 (0.2) 2 (0.2)
Tofacitinib 4 (0.8) 6 (0.6)
Biologics (all), n (%) 235 (49) 493 (51) 0.28
Biologic (in monotherapy), n (%) 117 (22) 239 (25)
Anti-TNF 71 (15) 134 (14)
Vedolizumab 25 (5.2) 50 (5.2)
Ustekinumab 21 (4.3) 52 (5.4)
Combotherapy, n (%) 59 (12) 148 (15)
Anti-TNF plus thiopurines 37 (7.7) 85 (8.8)
Anti-TNF plus methotrexate 9 (1.9) 28 (2.9)
Vedolizumab plus thiopurines 5 (1) 11 (1.1)
Vedolizumab plus methotrexate 1 (0.2) 3 (0.3)
Ustekinumab plus thiopurines 5 (1) 15 (1.6)
Ustekinumab plus methotrexate 2 (0.4) 6 (0.6)