Skip to main content
Journal of Personalized Medicine logoLink to Journal of Personalized Medicine
. 2022 Dec 14;12(12):2064. doi: 10.3390/jpm12122064

Clinical-Epidemiology of Tension-Type Headache among the Medical and Dental Undergraduates of King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

Zia Ul Sabah 1, Shahid Aziz 1, Bayapa Reddy Narapureddy 2,*, Hassan Ahmed A Alasiri 3, Hassan Yahya M Asiri 3, Abdulkhaliq Hadi H Asiri 3, Ahmad Abdullah H Alsulami 3, Nawaf Khalid Ahmad Hassan 3, Shaik Mohammed Asif 4, Shmookh Mohsen Alsyd 5
Editors: Luca Ricciardi, Tamara Ius, Federico Nicolosi
PMCID: PMC9785983  PMID: 36556284

Abstract

Introduction (background): Headache is the primary complaint among students. Headaches mostly have multifactorial causes. The degree of headache severity significantly impacts attitudes, behavior, and academic performance. Objectives: Here, we investigate the demographic epidemiology of tension-type headaches (T.T.H.), and determine the clinical presentation and triggers of the tension-type among headache sufferers. Methods (settings, design): An institutional-based cross-sectional study (descriptive) was conducted on the medical and dental undergraduates at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia, from 1 July 2021 to 31 December 2021. Data were gathered using a pre-designed questionnaire. A consecutive sampling method was used in a COVID-19-constrained environment. After preliminary screening of the study population, 460 samples were included. An electronic questionnaire was shared with them, and they were requested to respond. Results: More than half of the participants (258, 56.1%) experienced tension-type headaches, while the remaining 202 (43.9%) never felt a headache. Tension-type headaches manifested as heaviness of the head (44, 17.0%), tightness (126, 48.8%), and dull aching pain (66, 25.7%). Conclusions: T.T.H. is a prevalent condition with a significant impingement on academic work, and psychological health. Tension-type headache sufferers are advised to keep daily diaries to determine triggers, and plan for prevention and treatment progression.

Keywords: headache/epidemiology, etiological factor, triggers of TTH, medical students, prevalence, tension-type headache

1. Introduction

A headache is a pain in the head; pain may be generalized so that the pain can be sensed all over the head. For some individuals, it may start in one area of the head [1]. Globally, almost half of the adult population suffered headaches at least once within the last year; headache attacks are categorized into primary and secondary headaches. Secondary headaches are associated with underlying medical conditions, and primary headaches include clusters, migraine, and T.T.H.s [2]. The International Classification of Headache Diagnosis I (ICHD I) coined the term tension-type-headache (T.T.H.) [3,4]. T.T.H. has previously been stated with several other terms (e.g., simple headache, stress headache, psychogenic headache, muscle contraction headache). Currently, the term tension-type-headache (T.T.H.) is commonly used [5]. A headache in T.T.H. is characterized by “tightening” and “pressing” pain around the head and can occur with various duration and frequencies. T.T.H. pain involves contracting muscles in the neck, jaw, face, and scalp [6]. T.T.H.s may also be caused by jaw clenching, depression, anxiety, or insomnia. Some conditions, such as temporomandibular joint pain and fibromyalgia with idiopathic oro-facial pain, mimic tension-type headaches and need to be differentiated before initiating treatment [7]. Unfortunately, the T.T.H. mechanism remains unclear; tension-type headache is a multifactorial disorder with several pathophysiological mechanisms. However, cluster headaches and migraines are thought to be initiated because of neurological dysfunction involving the cranial vessels [5]. The International Headache Society classified the T.T.H. based on the frequency of the attacks classified into episodic and chronic types [3,8]. Some concepts about the pathophysiology of episodic T.T.H. (headache 1–14 days per month) due to peripheral mechanisms (myofascial nociception), and chronic T.T.H. (headache 15 days per month) due to central mechanisms (sensitisation and inadequate endogenous pain control) [9,10].

Globally, three billion people are suffering from migraines or T.T.H.s. They are among the ten most common causes of burden worldwide, after dental caries and latent tuberculosis infection; T.T.H. is the third most prevalent disorder globally [11]. Globally, the lifetime prevalence of T.T.H. is 78% in the general adult population [12]. More than half (56%) of the adult population suffers from headache disorders; nearly 42% of people suffer from T.T.H.s, 11% from migraines, and 3% from chronic daily headaches [13,14]. T.T.H. is the most common primary headache among the general population. The prevalence of T.T.H.s reported by different studies ranges from 30% to 78% [2,15]. T.T.H. was reported more frequently among females than males, and the female-to-male ratio of T.T.H. was 1.8:1 [16]. The headache prevalence in Saudi Arabia ranged from 8% to 12%; T.T.H.s varied from 3.1% to 9.5%, among these headaches [17]. The headache prevalence among medical students was 53.78%, and for tension-type headache it was 41.66%. For migraine headache the prevalence was 7.1% [18]. Mohammed Jumah et al. revealed in K.S.A. that 1-year prevalence for all types of headaches was 77.2%. The prevalence of headache types, according to adjusted 1-year prevalence, were 34.1% for T.T.H. and 25.0% for migraine [19].

Headache is a significant common problem among university students, compared to other populations. Many studies have reported that headaches are more prevalent among the student community [20,21]. Headache is one of the significant complaints among medical students, perhaps due to the challenging syllabus, multiple exams, sleep deprivation, family stresses, long working hours, and psychological issues [1,2,22,23]. Stress is common in modern daily life, resulting from rapid environmental changes. In the present competitive world, students need to perform multiple tasks, and the increased stresses on students are why the student age is called the age of stress. Students were exposed to academic pressure from academic tests, assignments, attendance, and other university requirements; these stressors sometimes exceed their ability to cope [6]. Among medical students, the most reported headaches are T.T.H.s and migraines; these might be due to the long working hours, leading to fatigue, stress, and anxiety. Students with frequent headaches mostly suffer from lost study days which lead to reduced academic performance, poor concentration, and poor attitudes and behavior [24].

The current study has planned to identify the demography and epidemiology of tension-type headaches among undergraduate medical students to determine the clinical presentation and triggers of T.T.H. among the study participants, and assess the attitude towards T.T.H. management.

2. Methodology

Study on the medical and dental undergraduate students at King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia. An institutional-based cross-sectional (descriptive) study was conducted in a COVID-19-constrained environment from 1 July 2021 to 31 December 2021. The data were gathered using a pre-designed survey questionnaire. The researchers developed the questionnaire, and a panel of three experts independently validated the questionnaire. The questionnaire comprises three parts: Part 1 consists of socio-demographic data, such as gender, age, college, and marital status. Part 2 discusses the clinical characteristics, onset, aggravating and relieving factors of T.T.H.s. Part 3 examines the effect of T.T.H.s on students′ academic performance, attitudes, and behavior. The study participants were recruited after preliminary screening telephonically by expert (qualified medical practitioners) authors. The participants excluded those with nasal deformity, ear problems, chronic psychological conditions, individuals with visual disorders who were not willing to participate and were on long leave.

The study participants met the inclusion criteria, and the self-administered electronic study tool (Google Forms) link was shared with them through WhatsApp and emails. Before beginning to fill out the google form, this study′s objectives and goals were provided for participants, in the local language and English also. At the beginning of the survey, the tool explained data confidentiality and assured participants that personal data, that can recognize the individuals, were not collected; the data were stored in coded form only, after assuring them digital consent was obtained; and participants accepted the privacy policy for the protection of personal data, before completing the survey. A consecutive sampling technique was used to recruit the study sample. The minimum sample size was determined using the formula 4pq/d2 with a 95% confidence interval of 452. This study ultimately included 460 participants.

2.1. Ethical Issues

As per the Declaration of Helsinki, digital consent was obtained from the participants before the study proceeded. Institutional Ethical approval (E.C.M. #2021-4909) was acquired from the Research Ethics Committee (HAPO-06-B-001) of King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia, K.S.A.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The validated data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics) for Windows, version 21 (I.B.M. Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). All the collected data were downloaded in a Microsoft Office 2019 Excel spreadsheet from Google Forms. Categorical variables, such as demographic data, academic data, headache-related data, clinical features, and aggravating and relieving factors were expressed in proportions to test the hypothesis. The Chi-square test was applied. The p-value of <0.05 was considered significant at the 95% confidence interval level.

3. Results

A total of 460 students submitted the completed study questionnaire; 256 (55.7%) belonged to the college of medicine, and 204 (44.3%) belonged to the college of dentistry, respectively. The study sample is slightly higher among males (261, 56.7%) than females (199, 43.3%), with a ratio of 1.3:1. Among the 460 participants, the participants had a mean age of 22.3 ± 4.9 years (ranging from 18 to 27 years) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Distribution of study subjects based on demographic profile.

Gender p Value
Female Male Total
Count Row N % Count Row N % Count Row N %
Age 18–19 Yrs. 11 64.7% 6 35.3% 17 100% X2 = 4.49
Df: 2
p > 0.05 Not significant
20–25 Yrs. 184 42.9% 245 57.1% 429 100%
25 Yrs. 4 28.6% 10 71.4% 14 100%
Marital status Married 7 77.8% 2 22.2% 9 100% -
Unmarried 192 42.6% 259 57.4% 451 100%
Program Dental 132 64.7% 72 35.3% 204 100% X2 = 68.69
Df: 1
p < 0.0001 significant
Medicine 67 26.2% 189 73.8% 256 100%
Academic level 2nd level 23 62.2% 14 37.8% 37 100% X2 = 74.2
Df: 9
p < 0.001 Significant
3rd level 12 26.7% 33 73.3% 45 100%
4th level 48 81.4% 11 18.6% 59 100%
5th level 13 40.6% 19 59.4% 32 100%
6th level 34 63.0% 20 37.0% 54 100%
7th level 16 30.2% 37 69.8% 53 100%
8th level 28 34.6% 53 65.4% 81 100%
9th level 5 38.5% 8 61.5% 13 100%
10th level 11 22.9% 37 77.1% 48 100%
11th level 9 23.7% 29 76.3% 38 100%
Total 199 43.3% 261 56.7% 460 100%

T.T.H. was present in 56.1% (258), while 43.9% (202) had not experienced T.T.H. attacks; out of 258 tension-type headaches, 118 (45.2%) were males, and 140 (70.3%) were females, with a ratio of female to male 1.18:1. Out of 204 dental undergraduate students, the majority (128, 62.7%) of them reported T.T.H. attacks, compared to (130, 50.7%) of the medical college undergraduate participants; the difference was of statistical significance (p < 0.01). The female gender (140, 70.4%) experienced more attacks of T.T.H., compared to the male participants (118, 45.2%); the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). T.T.H. was reported in higher rates among married (7, 77.8%), senior students, and those in their clinical years of study. Details have been provided in Table 2.

Table 2.

Distribution of subjects based on demographic profile and T.T.H. history.

T.T.H. p Value
No Yes Total
No % No % No %
Gender Female 59 29.6% 140 70.4% 199 100.0% X2 = 28.9
Df: 1
p < 0.001 Significant
Male 143 54.8% 118 45.2% 261 100.0%
Age 18–19 Yrs. 7 41.2% 10 58.8% 17 100.0% X2 = 0.42
Df: 2
p >> 1.0 Not significant
20–25 Yrs. 190 44.3% 239 55.7% 429 100.0%
25 Yrs. 5 35.7% 9 64.3% 14 100.0%
Marital status Married 2 22.2% 7 77.8% 9 100.0% X2 = 1.7
Df: 1
p > 0.18 Not significant
Unmarried 200 44.3% 251 55.7% 451 100.0%
Program Dental 76 37.3% 128 62.7% 204 100.0% X2 = 6.5
Df: 1
p < 0.01 Significant
Medicine 126 49.2% 130 50.8% 256 100.0%
Academic level 10th level 29 60.4% 19 39.6% 48 100.0% X2 = 26.0
Df: 9
p < 0.002 Significant
11th level 16 42.1% 22 57.9% 38 100.0%
2nd level 19 51.4% 18 48.6% 37 100.0%
3rd level 26 57.8% 19 42.2% 45 100.0%
4th level 17 28.8% 42 71.2% 59 100.0%
5th level 7 21.9% 25 78.1% 32 100.0%
6th level 21 38.9% 33 61.1% 54 100.0%
7th level 19 35.8% 34 64.2% 53 100.0%
8th level 40 49.4% 41 50.6% 81 100.0%
9th level 8 61.5% 5 38.5% 13 100.0%
Total 202 43.9% 258 56.1% 460 100.0%

Headache was felt as a heaviness/fullness of the head among 44 (17%) students, a sensation of a tight band around the head among 126 (48.7%), numbness was felt by 16 (6.2%), and dull aching pain by 62 (24%). The onset of headache was reported as sudden onset (52, 20.1%) and gradual (54, 20.9%), but a majority of the 142 (55%) students had no specific onset (variable). Headaches appeared in the morning (30, 11.6%); some felt headaches more frequently at the end of the day (47, 18.2%). The headache attack lasted for hours among most students (179, 69.3%), and was mainly bilateral (191, 74.1%) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Distribution of study subjects based on Clinical features of tension headache.

Gender
Female Male
TTH TTH
No Yes Total No Yes Total
No % No % No % No % No % No %
Nature of tension headache Not Applicable 59 96.7% 2 3.3% 61 100.0% 143 94.7% 8 5.3% 151 100.0%
Heaviness of head 0 0.0% 22 100.0% 22 100.0% 0 0.0% 22 100.0% 22 100.0%
Numbness of the head 0 0.0% 7 100.0% 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 9 100.0% 9 100.0%
Dull aching pain on the total head 0 0.0% 37 100.0% 37 100.0% 0 0.0% 25 100.0% 25 100.0%
Tight banding pressure of the head 0 0.0% 72 100.0% 72 100.0% 0 0.0% 54 100.0% 54 100.0%
Onset of T.T.H. Not Applicable 59 96.7% 2 3.3% 61 100.0% 143 94.7% 8 5.3% 151 100.0%
Suddenly 0 0.0% 35 100.0% 35 100.0% 0 0.0% 17 100.0% 17 100.0%
Gradually 0 0.0% 22 100.0% 22 100.0% 0 0.0% 32 100.0% 32 100.0%
Varies time to time 0 0.0% 81 100.0% 81 100.0% 0 0.0% 61 100.0% 61 100.0%
Duration of Headache Minutes 0 0.0% 15 100.0% 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 24 100.0% 24 100.0%
Hours 0 0.0% 103 100.0% 103 100.0% 0 0.0% 76 100.0% 76 100.0%
Days 0 0.0% 20 100.0% 20 100.0% 0 0.0% 10 100.0% 10 100.0%
Not Applicable 59 96.7% 2 3.3% 61 100.0% 143 94.7% 8 5.3% 151 100.0%
On which side of the head feel the headache Not Applicable 59 96.7% 2 3.3% 61 100.0% 143 94.7% 8 5.3% 151 100.0%
Left side 0 0.0% 7 100.0% 7 100.0% 0 0.0% 8 100.0% 8 100.0%
Right side 0 0.0% 21 100.0% 21 100.0% 0 0.0% 21 100.0% 21 100.0%
Both sides 0 0.0% 110 100.0% 110 100.0% 0 0.0% 81 100.0% 81 100.0%
The pattern of the headache More during day time 0 0.0% 14 100.0% 14 100.0% 0 0.0% 16 100.0% 16 100.0%
More at the end of day 0 0.0% 25 100.0% 25 100.0% 0 0.0% 22 100.0% 22 100.0%
Not specific 0 0.0% 99 100.0% 99 100.0% 0 0.0% 72 100.0% 72 100.0%
Not Applicable 59 96.7% 2 3.3% 61 100.0% 143 94.7% 8 5.3% 151 100.0%
No of days had headaches in the past month 1–3 days 0 0.0% 44 100.0% 44 100.0% 0 0.0% 49 100.0% 49 100.0%
4–6 days 0 0.0% 47 100.0% 47 100.0% 0 0.0% 30 100.0% 30 100.0%
>6 days 0 0.0% 47 100.0% 47 100.0% 0 0.0% 31 100.0% 31 100.0%
Not Applicable 59 96.7% 2 3.3% 61 100.0% 143 94.7% 8 5.3% 151 100.0%
How long does each headache attack last? <2 h 0 0.0% 37 100.0% 37 100.0% 0 0.0% 44 100.0% 44 100.0%
2–4 h 0 0.0% 45 100.0% 45 100.0% 0 0.0% 32 100.0% 32 100.0%
4–24 h 0 0.0% 32 100.0% 32 100.0% 0 0.0% 18 100.0% 18 100.0%
24–72 h 0 0.0% 9 100.0% 9 100.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 6 100.0%
Not Applicable 59 77.6% 17 22.4% 76 53.1% 143 88.8% 18 11.2% 161 100.0%
Total 59 29.6% 140 70.4% 199 100.0% 143 54.8% 118 45.2% 261 100.0%

More than half of the students complained of T.T.H. attacks that started after puberty (241, 93.5%). The majority of participants 329 (71.5%) did not know their family members′ T.T.H. status. Family history of T.T.H. was reported among 62 (13.5%) students, and family history was strongly associated with the T.T.H., and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Among the 51 (11.0%) smokers, more than half of the smokers were T.T.H. sufferers (32, 62.7%). Out of 140 female participants, 29 (11.2%) reported that headache was aggravated by their menstrual cycle. Additionally, T.T.H. was more associated with sleep deprivation and oversleeping; sleep of lesser duration (<5 h) and more than 8 h sleep aggravated the T.T.H. episodes, compared to adequate sleep of 6–8 h per day. The difference was statistically significant (0.001). Most of the study participants (376, 81.7%) had adequate sleep (6–8 h), among the T.T.H. sufferers. Mood swings (147, 56.9%) was the most common aura for the T.T.H., followed by neck pain (21, 8.1%), dizziness (19, 7.3%), tingling sensation (18, 6.9%), blurring of vision/photophobia (5, 1.9%), and fatigue activity performed with effort (14, 5.4%). Most of the participants (189, 73.2%) expressed that psychological stress was the most common headache trigger, followed by physical effort (41, 15.8%), drinking too much caffeine (9, 3.5%), and hunger (6, 2.3%). Most often (161, 62.4%), the headaches could be relieved by resting, such as lying down/sleeping in a quiet, dark room. The details of etiological factors for T.T.H.s are provided in Table 4.

Table 4.

Distribution of study subjects based on aggravating and relieving (triggers) factors vs. tension headache.

T.T.H. History p = Value
No Yes Total
No % No % No %
T.T.H. started Childhood 0 0.0% 9 100.0% 9 100.0% -
After Puberty 0 0.0% 241 100.0% 241 100.0%
Not applicable 202 96.2% 8 3.8% 210 100.0%
Family history Don’t know 197 59.90% 132 40.10% 329 100.00% X2 = 119
Df: 2
p < 0.0001
Significant
No 3 4.30% 66 95.70% 69 100.00%
Yes 2 3.20% 60 96.80% 62 100.00%
Smoking No 183 44.72% 226 55.3% 409 100.00% X2 = 26.9
Df: 1
p < 0.0001
Significant
Yes 19 37.25% 32 62.74% 51 100.00%
Sleep duration <5 h 2 3.40% 56 96.60% 58 100.00% X2 = 64
Df: 2
p < 0.0001
Significant
6–8 h 198 52.70% 178 47.30% 376 100.00%
>8 h 2 7.70% 24 92.30% 26 100.00%
T.T.H. Menstrual association Don’t know 0 0.0% 56 100.0% 56 100.0% -
No 0 0.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Yes 0 0.0% 29 100.0% 29 100.0%
Not Applicable 202 63.8% 114 36.2% 316 100.0%
T.T.H. Severity Mild T.T.H. 0 0.0% 51 100.0% 51 100.0%
Moderate 0 0.0% 138 100.0% 138 100.0%
Severe T.T.H. 0 0.0% 59 100.0% 59 100.0%
Not Applicable 202 95.3% 10 4.7% 212 100.0%
Do you feel any of the following before the headache starts? Mood changes 0 0.0% 147 100.0% 147 100.0% -
Neck pain 0 0.0% 21 100.0% 21 100.0%
Dizziness 0 0.0% 19 100.0% 19 100.0%
Tingling or numbness 0 0.0% 18 100.0% 18 100.0%
Daily activity with effort 0 0.0% 15 100.0% 15 100.0%
Change of Appetite 0 0.0% 14 100.0% 14 100.0%
Blurring of vision 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 5 100.0%
Irritable 0 0.0% 5 100.0% 5 100.0%
Zig-zag lines 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 4 100.0%
Not Applicable 202 95.3% 10 4.7% 212 100.0%
Do any of the following cause headaches? Psychological Stressors 0 0.0% 189 100.0% 189 100.0% -
Physical stress 0 0.0% 41 100.0% 41 100.0%
Drinking large amount of Caffeine 0 0.0% 9 100.0% 9 100.0%
Hunger 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 6 100.0%
Eating specific item 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 3 100.0%
Not Applicable 202 95.3% 10 4.7% 212 100.0%
Relieving factor for your headache? Sleep or lying down 0 0.0% 161 100.0% 161 100.0% -
Head massage 0 0.0% 62 100.0% 62 100.0%
Cold compresses on the head or neck. 0 0.0% 19 100.0% 19 100.0%
Physical activity and sports 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 6 100.0%
Not Applicable 202 95.3% 10 4.7% 212 100.0%
Total 202 43.90% 258 56.10% 460 100.00%

A few participants (46, 17.8%) needed medical attention, and 186 (72.1%) reported that headaches interfered with their daily activities. Many (168, 65.1%) used analgesics to get rid of headaches (Table 4), and 19 (76%) of the undergraduates, who were suffering from T.T.H., purchased the drugs over the counter without any consultation with a physician. (Table 5)

Table 5.

Distribution of study sample based on attitudes, behavior, and c.

Consequences No (258) %
Needed medical care due to headache
Yes 46 17.8%
No 212 82.2%
Headaches interfere daily activities
Yes 186 72.1%
No 72 27.9%
How often do you need to stop your work or daily activities to deal with headache symptoms?
None of the time 32 17.2%
Sometimes 105 56.5%
Most of the times 44 23.7%
All the time 5 2.7%
Do you use any illegal (sedative) drugs?
Yes 3 1.2%
No 255 98.8%
Use analgesics for headache
Yes 168 65.1%
No 90 34.9%
If using analgesics, did you have side effects?
Yes 25 14.9%
No 143 85.1%
If using analgesics, Is it purchased over the counter? (n = 25)
Yes 19 76%
No 6 24%

4. Discussion

The current study has been conducted to establish the epidemiological factors contributing to T.T.H. among the student community. A total of 55.7% belonged to the medical college, and 44.3% belonged to the dental college. Out of 460 participants, nearly 56.7% were males, and 43.3% were females. The sample distribution was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The majority of the participants belonged to the 20–25 years age bracket. This is the usual age for undergraduate study. The majority of the participants were unmarried. Only a few were married, and those married were among the females. The study by M.S. alkarrash et al., also noted concordant results [25].

The overall prevalence of T.T.H. was 56.1%, and this was greater among females (70.3%) than males (45.2%) with a ratio of 1.18:1, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Similar studies conducted by Stovner et al. [13] and Muayqil et al. [15] have reported comparable findings: the female-to-male ratio is about 5:4, and 1.8:1. Individuals in the higher age group and with a higher education level are more at risk for getting a tension-type headache. Another study in Saudi Arabia by Mohammed et al. [19] aligned with this study′s results. T.T.H. was the most common type of headache (42.9%), followed by migraine at 25% [19]. Headaches were predominantly in the female population. In another similar study conducted in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, by Almesned et al. [18], the prevalence of T.T.H.s was 41.66%, with almost equal distribution of headaches in males (42%) and females (41.2%). The married students complained more about T.T.H. than the unmarried; this may be due to family stress and academic stress. Dental program students had T.T.H. more than the medical students. Whereas other studies conducted by MS Alakarrash et.al., in Syria [25] and Ruba M Saeed in Madina K.S.A. [26], observed that dental college students were having less tension-type headaches than medical undergraduates. This high prevalence in dental students in this study might be due to the COVID-19 pandemic; the dental college students were more worried about the COVID-19 infection spreading e.g., through the saliva, and contact with other mouth secretions [27].

Regarding the presentation of clinical features of T.T.H., tightness of the head is the most typical symptom, followed by heaviness or fullness, such as a tight band around the head. The onset of headache attacks was variable (sudden or gradual), and lasted for hours among three-quarters of the students. Additionally, T.T.H. attacks were bilateral among three out of four participants. Similar studies conducted by Pellegrino et al. [28], Fernandez et al. [29], and Hassan M et al. [6] also reported, almost coinciding findings. T.T.H.s start in the daytime and increase slowly throughout the day for most students [6].

More than half of the students complained of T.T.H. attacks that started after puberty (93.5%). The aura (prodrome) in the current study showed that more than half of the students reported experiencing mood change before the headache attack, one-tenth had neck pain, and about one-tenth experienced easy fatigability with low effort. The same type of diurnal variation of T.T.H. was observed by various other studies conducted in different locations: Mona Hassan et al. [6], Schytz et al. [30], and Spierings et al. [31]. This study noted that menstruation among female students was associated with frequent T.T.H. (catamenial) attacks [32]. The Spierings et al. [31] study also noticed that menstruation is one of the triggers for tension-type headaches. The most commonly reported trigger factors were fatigue and stress. Other factors included physical activity, sleep deprivation, hunger, and having too much coffee. Studies conducted by the European Headache Federation et al. [33], another study in Saudi Arabia by Ghada Kamal Gouhar [21], and Al Jumah et al. [19] also reported parallel triggers for T.T.H. and migraine. Most participants reported that the T.T.H. attacks were relieved by resting (lying down and sleeping) in a calm, dark room. Other relieving factors included keeping active in their activity, head massages, and cold packs applied to their eyes, head, and neck. A study by Palacios-Ceña M et al. [34] also observed consistency with this study regarding relieving factors to relieve the tension-type headache.

Regarding the effect of headaches on students′ attitudes, behavior, and daily activities, this study revealed that only 17.8% of the students with T.T.H. needed formal medical care; however, two-thirds of these students used analgesics to relieve their pain and discomfort. Similar studies, conducted by different authors, had findings that were also in concordance with this study [25,35]. Two-thirds of the students reported that headaches disrupted their activities of daily living. The results of Al Hasahel et al.′s [36] study in Kuwait among students align with this study′s findings regarding the effect of headaches on daily life activities [19].

5. Conclusions

Headaches are a frequent complaint among university undergraduate students. They commonly experience psychological stress and physical symptoms that affect their daily life activities. There is a substantial relationship between level of stress and T.T.H., with severity and duration of T.T.H. Some food items aggravate T.T.H., and T.T.H. can also be associated with the menstrual cycle. Sufferers should keep a daily record of the frequency, duration, time of initiation, aggravating factors, and severity of T.T.H. attacks, and also the relieving factors such as sleep, head massage, cold fomentation, and medications used. This would be helpful for T.T.H. sufferers, so they can avoid those triggers and plan for the prevention of T.T.H. Additionally, it also helps doctors to design the course of management for severe T.T.H. cases.

Limitations

It is paramount to foster a stress-free natural world that will enable the students to put full effort into excelling in their academics. This study was conducted in a COVID-19 pandemic-restricted time. Selection bias is likely in the sample; it focuses on the medical communities, and neglects the other branches due to COVID constraints. This study has been carried out in one university with a limited sample; much of the data are collected from known cases. Therefore, results may not be extrapolated completely. A study should be conducted with a large sample, using a more systematic sampling method. This might improve the representativeness and generalizability of the findings, and a national policy could be developed to address this problem. Self-reporting is another limitation of the present study, with some participants perhaps giving socially accepted responses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and Methodology, Z.U.S., S.A., B.R.N., H.A.A.A., H.Y.M.A., A.H.H.A., A.A.H.A. and N.K.A.H.; Data Curation, H.A.A.A., H.Y.M.A., A.H.H.A., A.A.H.A. and S.M.A. (Shaik Mohammed Asif); software, B.R.N., S.M.A. (Shaik Mohammed Asif), S.M.A. (Shmookh Mohsen Alsyd) and Z.U.S.; Supervision, Z.U.S., S.A., S.M.A. (Shmookh Mohsen Alsyd) and S.M.A. (Shaik Mohammed Asif); formal analysis, B.R.N. and S.M.A. (Shmookh Mohsen Alsyd); investigation, H.A.A.A., H.Y.M.A., A.H.H.A., A.A.H.A. and N.K.A.H.; writing—original draft Z.U.S., S.A., B.R.N., S.M.A. (Shmookh Mohsen Alsyd), H.A.A.A. and H.Y.M.A.; preparation, S.M.A. (Shmookh Mohsen Alsyd) and B.R.N.; writing—review and editing, S.M.A. (Shaik Mohammed Asif), B.R.N., H.A.A.A., H.Y.M.A. and S.M.A. (Shmookh Mohsen Alsyd); visualization, S.M.A. (Shaik Mohammed Asif) and B.R.N.; supervision, Z.U.S. and B.R.N.; project administration, Z.U.S. and S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

As per the Declaration of Helsinki, Institutional Ethical approval (ECM. #2021-4909) was acquired from the Research Ethics Committee (HAPO-06-B-001) of King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia, K.S.A.

Informed Consent Statement

Digital consent was obtained from the participants after explaining the study objectives before the study proceeded.

Data Availability Statement

Data available with Author’s sharing does not apply to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Khalid University for funding this work through the large research group program number RGP.2/216/43.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.American Migraine Foundation; [(accessed on 30 November 2022)]. Tension Headache. Available online: https://americanmigrainefoundation.org/resource-library/tension-type-headache/ [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olesen J. International Classification of Headache Disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:396–397. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30085-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (I.H.S.) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version) Cephalalgia Int. J. Headache. 2013;33:629–808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gobel H. ICHD-3; [(accessed on 30 November 2022)]. 2. Tension-Type Headache (T.T.H.) Available online: https://ichd-3.org/2-tension-type-headache/ [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Cephalalgia Int. J. Headache. 1988;8((Suppl 7)):1–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hassan M., Asaad T. Tension-type headache, its relation to stress, and how to relieve it by cryotherapy among academic students. Middle East Curr. Psychiatry. 2020;27:20. doi: 10.1186/s43045-020-00030-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Saccomanno S., Saran S., Vanella V., Mastrapasqua R.F., Capogreco M., Carretta G., Pirino A., Scoppa F. Is there any correlation between malocclusion, temporomandibular disorders, and systemic disease? The importance of differential diagnosis. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 2022;36:149–156. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Olesen J., Steiner T.J., Bendtsen L., Dodick D., Ducros A., Evers S., First M., Goadsby P.J., Hershey A., Katsarava Z., et al. The International Classification of Headache Disorders 3rd Edition Abbreviated pocket version for reference by professional users only: 28. International Headache Society. England. [(accessed on 30 November 2022)]. Available online: https://ihs-headache.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ICHD-3-Pocket-version.pdf.
  • 9.Bendtsen L., Evers S., Linde M., Mitsikostas D.D., Sandrini G., Schoenen J. E.F.N.S. guideline on the treatment of tension-type headache—report of an E.F.N.S. task force. Eur. J. Neurol. 2010;17:1318–1325. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2010.03070.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jackson J.L., Mancuso J.M., Nickoloff S., Bernstein R., Kay C. Tricyclic and Tetracyclic Antidepressants for the Prevention of Frequent Episodic or Chronic Tension-Type Headache in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2017;32:1351–1358. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-4121-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vos T., Abajobir A.A., Abate K.H., Abbafati C., Abbas K.M., Abd-Allah F., Abdulkader R.S., Abdulle A.M., Abebo T.A., Abera S.F., et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017;390:1211–1259. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32154-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bendtsen L. Headache, Tension-Type. In: Aminoff M.J., Daroff R.B., editors. Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press; Oxford, UK: 2014. [(accessed on 30 November 2022)]. pp. 524–527. Available online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123851574010988. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stovner L.J., Hagen K., Linde M., Steiner T.J. The global prevalence of headache: An update, with analysis of the influences of methodological factors on prevalence estimates. J. Headache Pain. 2022;23:34. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01402-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Anaya F., Abu Alia W., Hamoudeh F., Nazzal Z., Maraqa B. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of headache among medical students in Palestine: A cross sectional study. BMC Neurol. 2022;22:4. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02526-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Muayqil T., Al-Jafen B.N., Al-Saaran Z., Al-Shammari M., Alkthiry A., Muhammad W.S., Murshid R., Alanazy M.H. Migraine and Headache Prevalence and Associated Comorbidities in a Large Saudi Sample. Eur. Neurol. 2018;79:126–134. doi: 10.1159/000487317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kandil M.R., Hamed S.A., Fadel K.A., Youssef A.H., El M.A.A. Epidemiology of tension-type headache (T.T.H.) in Assuit Governorate, Egypt. J. Neurol. Neurosci. 2014;5:16. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Alwahbi M.K., Alamri M.M., Alammar A.M., Alanazi A.M., Alotaibi A.G., Alharbi S.K. Prevalence of Migraine among Medical Students of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. Int. J. Sci. Res. (IJSR) 2015;6:894–898. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Almesned I.S., Alqahtani N.G., Alarifi J.A., Alsaawy T.N., Agha S., Alhumaid M.A. Prevalence of primary headache among medical students at King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care. 2018;7:1193–1196. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_240_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Al Jumah M., Al Khathaami A.M., Kojan S., Hussain M., Thomas H., Steiner T.J. The prevalence of primary headache disorders in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional population-based study. J. Headache Pain. 2020;21:11. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-1081-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Khairoalsindi O.A., Saber W.K., Althubaiti N.A., Alshareef E.F., Almekhlafi M.A. Primary headache characters and coping strategies among medical students of Umm Al-Qura University in the Western Region of Saudi Arabia. Neurosci. Riyadh Saudi Arab. 2018;23:308–313. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2018.4.20180256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gouhar G.K., Tamimm R.E., AlMahri S.M., Almogati A.L., Alsaeed H.M., Almuryidi M.S., Skair R.A., Almalki A.A. Migraine among Princess Nourah BInt. Abdulrahman University students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Med. Dev. Ctries. 2018;2:103–108. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Desouky D.E., Zaid H.A., Taha A.A. Migraine, tension-type headache, and depression among Saudi female students in Taif University. J. Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2019;94:7. doi: 10.1186/s42506-019-0008-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lebedeva E.R., Kobzeva N.R., Gilev D.V., Kislyak N.V., Olesen J. Psychosocial factors associated with migraine and tension-type headache in medical students. Cephalalgia Int. J. Headache. 2017;37:1264–1271. doi: 10.1177/0333102416678389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saleh D., Camart N., Romo L. Predictors of Stress in College Students. Front. Psychol. 2017;8:19. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Alkarrash M.S., Shashaa M.N., Kitaz M.N., Rhayim R., Alhasan M.M., Alassadi M., Aldakhil A., Alkhamis M., Ajam M., Douba M., et al. Migraine and tension-type headache among undergraduate medical, dental and pharmaceutical students of University of Aleppo: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Neurol. Open. 2021;3:e000211. doi: 10.1136/bmjno-2021-000211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Saeed R.M., Saeed H.M., Al-Harby M.A., Alsoheeme N.S., Al-Ofui E.A., Metwally M.H. Prevalence of Headache among Taibah University Students in Al Madinah. Int. J. Med. Res. Prof. 2018;4:71–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Saccomanno S., Saran S., De Luca M., Mastrapasqua R.F., Raffaelli L., Levrini L. The Influence of SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic on TMJ Disorders, OSAS and BMI. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19:7154. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pellegrino A.B.W., Davis-Martin R.E., Houle T.T., Turner D.P., Smitherman T.A. Perceived triggers of primary headache disorders: A meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1188–1198. doi: 10.1177/0333102417727535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fernández-de-las-Peñas C., Palacios-Ceña M., Castaldo M., Wang K., Guerrero-Peral Á., Catena A., Arendt-Nielsen L. Variables associated with use of symptomatic medication during a headache attack in individuals with tension-type headache: A European study. BMC Neurol. 2020;20:43. doi: 10.1186/s12883-020-1624-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schytz H.W., Amin F.M., Jensen R.H., Carlsen L., Maarbjerg S., Lund N., Aegidius K., Thomsen L.L., Bach F.W., Beier D., et al. Reference programme: Diagnosis and treatment of headache disorders and facial pain. Danish Headache Society, 3rd edition, 2020. J. Headache Pain. 2021;22:22. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01228-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Spierings E.L.H., Ranke A.H., Honkoop P.C. Precipitating and Aggravating Factors of Migraine Versus Tension-type Headache. Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2001;41:554–558. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006554.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Moy G., Gupta V. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island, FL, USA: 2022. [(accessed on 1 December 2022)]. Menstrual Related Headache. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557451/ [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Brighina F., Catalano E., Firpo V., Cosentino G., Cillino S., Fierro B. 11th European Headache Federation Congress jointly with 31st Congress of the Italian Society for the Study of Headaches: Rome, Italy. 1–3 December 2017. J. Headache Pain. 2017;18((Suppl 1)):111. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0817-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Palacios-Ceña M., Castaldo M., Wang K., Catena A., Torelli P., Arendt-Nielsen L., Fernández-De-Las-Peñas C. Relationship of active trigger points with related disability and anxiety in people with tension-type headache. Medicine. 2017;96:e6548. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Del Blanco Muñiz J.A., Zaballos Laso A. Tension-type headache. Narrative review of physiotherapy treatment. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2018;41:371–380. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.0379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Al-Hashel J.Y., Alroughani R., Shuaibi S., AlAshqar A., AlHamdan F., AlThufairi H., Owayed S., Ahmed S.F. Impact of primary headache disorder on quality of life among school students in Kuwait. J. Headache Pain. 2020;21:80. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01124-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data available with Author’s sharing does not apply to this article.


Articles from Journal of Personalized Medicine are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES