Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;31(6):e13754. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13754

TABLE 9.

Characteristics reported of the drop‐outs in the various studies

Demographics
  • No difference in age (Henry et al., 2018)

  • Being younger (Bray et al., 2017)

  • Men (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015; Willems, Bolman, et al., 2017)

  • Lower educational level (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015; Kubo et al., 2018)

  • Lower income (Kubo et al., 2018)

  • Higher social functioning (Willems, Bolman, et al., 2017)

  • Less occupied with household activities (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015)

  • Shorter time since diagnosis (Kubo et al., 2018)

Health
  • Higher rates of antidepressant use (Bray et al., 2017)

  • Suffering from fatigue shorter (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015)

  • Poorer quality of life (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015)

  • Less good prognosis (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015)

  • More comorbidities (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015)

  • Less often breast cancer (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015)

  • More often ‘other’ cancer (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015)

  • Less often already received help to manage fatigue (Spahrkäs et al., 2020b)

Other
  • No difference between any of the background/outcome variables (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2017; Zachariae et al., 2018)

  • Being in intervention group (Willems, Bolman, et al., 2017; Zernicke et al., 2014)