TABLE 10.

Characteristics and relations reported of (non‐)adherent participants in the various studies

Intervention usage

Higher baseline anxiety/depression leads to less training time (Bray et al., 2017) More module use was predicted to the indicatory red/orange ‘traffic lights’ (Kanera, Willems, et al., 2016) More module use was predicted by higher perceived relevance of modules (Kanera, Willems, et al., 2016) Less module use was related with having a partner (Kanera, Willems, et al., 2016)

Baseline/personality characteristics

Adherent users are female, non‐adherent users are male (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015; Mikolasek et al., 2018) Adherent users have (Mikolasek et al., 2018) Higher openness to experience Higher depression on HADS Higher resistance to change Non‐adherent users have (Bruggeman‐Everts et al., 2015) More often depression at baseline Lower education Less often a paid job Less use of sleep medication No previous experience with mindfulness Non‐completers have/are (Dozeman et al., 2017) More often daytime fatigue More often on sick leave Baseline characteristics/levels (e.g. age, baseline symptom, motivation, expectation) did not predict adherence (Henry et al., 2018; Owen et al., 2017; van den Berg et al., 2013; Zachariae et al., 2018)