Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 6;58(12):1801. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121801

Table 2.

Characteristics of included studies.

Study Inclusion Criteria Number of Patients Age, Mean ± SD BMI, kg/m2, Mean ± SD Defect, cm2, Mean ± SD Follow-Up Outcome Concomitant Intervention (HTO) Study Design etc.
Total Each Group
chung 2021 [23] younger than 65 years, ICRS grade III or IV cartilage defects (>2 cm2), mechanical femorotibial varus angles > 3°, and KL grade 3 93 N/A 56.6 years (43–65) 25.8 kg/m2 (20.9–33.2) median 6.5 cm2 (2.0–12.8) mean 1.7 Y (1.0–3.5 Y) IKDC, WOMAC, KSS, HSS, and ICRS with HTO retrospective cohort N/A
song 2020 (1) [19] older than 40 years, ICRS IV (>2 cm2), KL grade 1–3, and femorotibial angle (varus or valgus) < 8° 128 N/A 56.5 ± 7.9 (40–78) 24.6 ± 3.6 kg/m2 (17–45.8) one/two/three,
67 (4.5 ± 1.3)/49
(7.3 ± 2.9)/12 (9.8 ± 3.6)
36.1 ± 6.4 M (25–47 M) VAS, WOMAC, IKDC, and MOCART (for 34 pts) without HTO retrospective cohort subgroup analysis: trochlea lesion, age, and lesion size
song 2020 (2) [18] older than 40 years, ICRS IV (>4 cm2) in medial compartment, KL grade 1–3, and femorotibial angle varus > 5° 125 with trochlea lesion: 73 58.3 ± 6.8 (43–74) 25.6 ± 2.7 kg/m2
(19.2–35.5)
6.9 ± 2 cm2 3 Y VAS, WOMAC, IKDC, and ICRS with HTO retrospective cohort subgroup analysis: age, obesity, lesion size, location, and number of lesions
without trochlea lesion: 52
song 2020 (3) [21] older than 60 years with a kissing lesion of the medial compartment, full-thickness chondral defect ≥ 4 cm2 of MFC, and varus deformity ≥3° 25 N/A 64.9 ± 4.4 (60–76) 24.9 ± 3.1 kg/m2
(19.2–34.2)
total: 9.4 ± 3.1 cm2
(5.3–18.9 cm2),
MFC: 7.2 ± 1.9 cm2
(4.2–12.8 cm2), and MTC: 2.2 ± 1.1 cm2 (0.2–6.1 cm2)
26.7 ± 1.8 M (24–31 M) VAS, WOMAC, IKDC, and ICRS with HTO retrospective cohort with kissing lesion

subgroup analysis: age, BMI, and lesion size
Lee 2021 [22] ICRS ≥ 3B with kissing lesion in medial compartment 74 BMAC: 42 60.7 ± 4.1 26.1 ± 2.8 kg/m2 6.5 ± 2.9 cm2 20.7 ± 6.1 M HSS, WOMAC, KSS, and ICRS with HTO retrospective cohort with kissing lesion
hUCB-MSC: 32 58.1 ± 3.6 26.6 ± 3.0 kg/m2 7.0 ± 1.9 cm2 15.6 ± 2.8 M
Ryu 2022 [20] KL grade ≤ 2, ICRS IV, older than 15 years, and lesion size 2–10 cm2 (BMAC 15–50 yrs) 52 BMAC: 25 39.64 ± 9.83 26.19 ± 3.74 kg/m2 4.33 ± 1.66 cm2 VAS, IKDC, KOOS, and MOCART 5 pts with HTO retrospective cohort subgroup analysis based on age (45 yrs)
hUCB-MSC: 27 53.93 ± 8.6 26.38 ± 3.54 kg/m2 4.77 ± 1.81 cm2 2 Y 8 pts with HTO
Lim 2021 [17] aged > 18 years, full-thickness chondral defect 2–9 cm2, ICRS 4, and KL grade 1–3 89 hUCB-MSC: 43 55.3 ± 8.9 25.7 ± 2.8 kg/m2 4.9 ± 2.0 cm2 2 Y VAS, IKDC, WOMAC, and ICRS without HTO extended study after RCT subgroup analysis: age, lesion size
microfracture: 46 54.4 ± 10.8 26.7 ± 3.9 kg/m2 4.0 ± 1.8 cm2 2 Y
numbers of patients (extended follow-up data after RCT) 73 hUCB-MSC: 36 36 M: 33 (3 loss) 48 M: 28
(4 loss, 3 withdrew consent, and 1 AE)
60 M: 29
(3 loss, 3 withdrew consent, and 1 AE)
5 Y
microfracture: 37 36 M: 36 (1 loss) 48 M: 30
(6 withdrew consent, 1 reintervention)
60 M: 28
(7 withdrew consent,
2 reintervention)
5 Y

BMI = body mass index, SD = standard deviation, HTO = high tibial osteotomy, ICRS = International Cartilage Repair Society, KL = Kellgren Lawrence, MFC = medial femoral condyle, RCT = randomized controlled trial, Y = year, M = month, hUCB-MSC = human umbilical cord blood derived mesenchymal stem cell, BMAC = bone marrow aspiration concentrate, IKDC = International Knee Documentation Committee score, WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, VAS = visual analogue scale, KSS = Knee Society score, HSS = Hospital for Special Surgery, KOOS = Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome score, MOCART = Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue.