Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 1;8(4):64. doi: 10.3390/ijns8040064

Table 1.

Comparison of WD screening studies (Cp: ceruloplasmin; FP: false positive).

Hahn et al. [4] Ohura et al. [5] Yamaguchi et al. [6] Kroll et al. [12] This Study
(1993–95) (1977–96)
Sample size 3667 2789 126,810 24,165 353 359
Age range 3 m–15 y 1–6 y Newborn Late infancy to elementary school level 3 m–18 y 0–28 days and adult WD and carriers
Analytical method Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Particle-coated fluorescence immunoassay Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay Immunoturbidimetric assay
Mean ± SD Cp level (mg/L) 305 ± 95 124 ± 39.5 Unknown Unknown 400 ± 144 141 ± 37.5
Number of positive cases 1 WD (32-month-old) with DBS Cp 23 mg/L 2 WD with
neonatal DBS Cp 15 mg/L and 35 mg/L, respectively
953 FP
No WD detected
5 WD
Serum Cp < 100 mg/L
2 WD: neonatal Cp 26 mg/L and 28 mg/L, respectively 7 adults WD
(41–54 mg/L)
Remarks Repeated specimen was collected.
Follow up for the positive case after second testing.
-- Different cut-offs
High default rate (22% defaulted re-examination)
Consistent cut-off
No default
-- --
Conclusions Measurement of Cp level in DBS proposed as a reliable method for population screening of WD CP level in DBS from children aged 1 to 6 years as a reliable marker for early detection of WD -- Age of 3 years as the best point for WD mass screening Presymptomatic screening for WD using DBS is possible, even in newborn DBS Cp level measurement as potential marker for NBS WD