Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 7;10(11):e2022EF002751. doi: 10.1029/2022EF002751

Table 3.

A Comparison Between This Paper and the IPCC AR6 Values

References a Approach/processes This paper AR6 (Table 9.8 and Table 9.11) Remarks
2100 +2°C
Thermal expansion Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.18 b 0.18
Glaciers Marzeion et al. (2020) Temperature change, ensemble 10 climate models, 10 glacier models 0.15 0.11
Greenland Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment, medium confidence 0.10 0.30 << c AR6
Antarctica Levermann et al. (2020) Basal melt for 16 ice sheet models 0.39 0.25 >>AR6
Land water storage change Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.04 0.04
Total Range depending on correlation (Section 3) 0.72–0.86 0.79
2100 +5°C
Thermal expansion Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.36 0.36
Glaciers Marzeion et al. (2020) Temperature change, ensemble 10 climate models, 10 glacier models 0.27 0.20
Greenland Delhasse et al. (20182020) and Goelzer et al. (2020) ISMIP6 assessment including circulation changes and missing feedbacks leading to deep uncertainty 0.29 0.59 <<AR6
Antarctica Bulthuis et al. (2019), DeConto et al. (2021), and Golledge et al. (2015) Mixture basal melt and ice dynamical studies 0.59 0.56
Land water storage change Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.04 0.04
Total Range depending on correlation (Section 3) 1.27–1.55 1.60
2300 +2°C
Thermal expansion Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.35 0.35
Glaciers Goelzer et al. (2012) and Marzeion et al. (2012) Temperature change, single parameterized glacier models 0.28 0.29
Greenland Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.39 1.28 <<AR6
Antarctica Bulthuis et al. (2019), DeConto et al. (2021), and Golledge et al. (2015) Four ice dynamical studies with a range of physical processes simulated 1.35 1.56
Land water storage change Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.1 0.1
Total Range depending on correlation (Section 3) 2.19–2.47 3.1
2300 +8°C–10°C
Thermal expansion Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 1.51 1.51
Glaciers Farinotti et al. (2019) Temperature change, all glaciers melted 0.32 0.32
Greenland Church et al. (2013), Delhasse et al. (20182020) SMB changes including deep uncertainty 2.5 2.23
Antarctica Bulthuis et al. (2019), DeConto et al. (2021), and Golledge et al. (2015) Four ice dynamical studies with a range of physical processes simulated 6 13.54 <<AR6
Land water storage change Fox‐Kemper et al. (2021) AR6 assessment 0.10 0.10
Total Range depending on correlation (Section 3) 8.59–10.43 16.2
a

Reference used to compile the values in this study.

b

Values are in meters relative to a baseline period of 1995–2014.

c

>>/<< indicates more than 20% difference between this study and AR6. We used from AR6 the highest 83rd percentile projections across all probability distributions considered, including low confidence processes.