TABLE 3.
Self‐reported change in attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control and intention a
| Intervention | Organisation A | Organisation B | Organisations A & B | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | T1 | T0 | T1 | T0 | T1 | |
| N = 36 | N = 35 | N = 32 | N = 27 | N = 68 | N = 62 | |
| Attitude | 2.9 (0.3) | 2.9 (0.3) | 3.1 (0.3) | 3.0 (0.2) | 3.0 (0.3) | 2.9 (0.3) |
| Subjective norm | 3.1 (0.4) | 3.5 (0.5) | 3.0 (0.4) | 3.5 (0.4) | 3.1 (0.4) | 3.5 (0.5) |
| Perceived behavioural control | 3.6 (0.5) | 3.9 (0.5) | 3.6 (0.4) | 3.9 (0.7) | 3.6 (0.4) | 3.9 (0.6) |
| Intention | 3.9 (0.4) | 4.2 (0.5) | 3.9 (0.6) | 4.1 (0.6) | 3.9 (0.5) | 4.2 (0.6) |
| Control | N = 27 | N = 22 | N = 25 | N = 23 | N = 52 | N = 45 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attitude | 3.0 (0.3) | 3.0 (0.3) | 3.1 (0.3) | 3.0 (0.2) | 3.1 (0.3) | 3.0 (0.3) |
| Subjective norm | 3.2 (0.5) | 3.3 (0.5) | 3.0 (0.4) | 3.4 (0.4) | 3.1 (0.5) | 3.3 (0.5) |
| Perceived behavioural control | 3.7 (0.4) | 3.7 (0.6) | 3.6 (0.5) | 3.6 (0.4) | 3.7 (0.4) | 3.6 (0.5) |
| Intention | 3.8 (0.6) | 4.2 (0.5) | 4.0 (0.4) | 4.0 (0.6) | 3.9 (0.5) | 4.1 (0.6) |
a
All scores were measured on a 5‐point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (totally disagree to 5 (totally agree)). Some items were reverse coded. A higher score indicates: A more positive attitude towards involuntary treatment (involuntary treatment is more accepted). The subjective norm that involuntary treatment should not be applied. More perceived behavioural control to prevent/reduce involuntary treatment use. Higher intention to prevent/reduce involuntary treatment use.