Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 24;12(12):1182. doi: 10.3390/membranes12121182

Table 1.

Comparison of platforms developed for the manufacturing CAR-T cell therapies.

Name Company Principle Volume/Surface Area Scalability Gene
Editing?
Temperature Control Final formulation
CliniMACS Prodigy Miltenyi Biotec CentriCultUnit or
External culture vessel
low/dependant on
external vessel size
low In place Requires external temperature control when external vessel used. No reagent temperature control Fill and finish capable
Cocoon Lonza Customizable cassette 460 mL—low medium In place Duel environmental control for reagents and cell growth Fill and finish capable
Xuri cell Cytiva Wavebag 0.3–25 L—medium medium In place Integrated tray heater and sensors External finishing required
Duet Pump FibreCellSystems Hollow fibre membrane 80 cm2–1.2 m2 medium No Requires CO2 Incubator External finishing required
Quantum TERUMO Hollow fibre membrane 1.7–2.1 m2 High No Continuous control of temperature External finishing required
HF Primer CellCultureCompany Hollow fibre membrane 1.5 m2 medium No Requires CO2 Incubator Concentrates harvest but external finishing required
AutovaxID CellCultureCompany Hollow fibre membrane 80–100 L equivalent High No Automated control of temperature Integrated refrigerator for continuous harvest
AcuSyst-Maximizer CellCultureCompany Hollow fibre membrane 80–200 L equivalent High No Automated control of temperature Integrated refrigerator for continuous harvest and In-line filter for harvest clarification to reduce downstream processing
AcuSyst-Xcellerator CellCultureCompany Hollow fibre membrane 500–2000 L equivalent High No Automated control of temperature Integrated refrigerator for continuous harvest and In-line filter for harvest clarification to reduce downstream processing