Table 3.
Parameters of the LPM estimated by direct fitting as well as predicted using the PL and ML models coupled to the LPM along with the associated statistics.
| Runs | Direct Fitting | PL Prediction | ML Prediction | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qgen (J/min) | UA (J/min °C) | LPM RMSE (°C) | EBM RMSE (°C) 1 | Qgen (J/min) | UA (J/min °C) | LPM RMSE (°C) | EBM RMSE (°C) 1 | Qgen (J/min) | UA (J/min °C) | LPM RMSE (°C) | EBM RMSE (°C) 1 | |
| 2500 0.45 400 | 1481 | 68 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 1634 | 78 | 0.74 | 0.93 | 1792 | 77 | 1.51 | 1.02 |
| 2500 0.55 400 | 2495 | 101 | 0.42 | 0.59 | 2118 | 91 | 1.49 | 1.02 | 2506 | 95 | 1.44 | 1.00 |
| 3500 0.45 400 | 4084 | 118 | 0.50 | 1.56 | 4519 | 137 | 1.56 | 2.22 | 4555 | 132 | 0.59 | 2.17 |
| 2500 0.55 400 | 5567 | 147 | 0.56 | 1.01 | 5856 | 160 | 1.02 | 1.17 | 5911 | 162 | 1.19 | 1.29 |
| 4200 0.35 100 | 3185 | 84 | 0.66 | 1.13 | 4180 | 129 | 4.13 | 4.17 | 4359 | 124 | 2.08 | 1.63 |
1 RMSE data were taken from Guner et al. 2022 [33] for comparison with the LPM.