Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 16;2022:8044550. doi: 10.1155/2022/8044550

Table 3.

.The relationship between different variables and OS for breast cancer patients with nonpCR.

Variables Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (≤49 vs. >49) 1.22 (0.77-1.94) 0.401
Position (left vs. right) 1.31 (0.82-2.08) 0.253
Menopause (no vs. yes) 1.36 (0.86-2.16) 0.194
Parturition (0 vs. 1) 0.40 (0.22-0.74) 0.004 0.41 (0.22-0.77) 0.006
Parturition (0 vs. ≥2) 0.73 (0.38-1.43) 0.362 0.67 (0.33-1.34) 0.258
OS.INPS (≤0.3917 vs. >0.3917) 2.81 (1.75-4.51) <0.001 2.41 (1.45-4.01) <0.001
OS.L (≤1.48 vs. >1.48) 0.60 (0.35-1.02) 0.057
OS.N (≤5.9 vs. >5.9) 2.38 (1.31-4.35) 0.005 1.67 (0.85-3.25) 0.134
OS.M (≤0.36 vs. >0.36) 1.31 (0.79-2.16) 0.292
OS.HB (≤132 vs. >132) 0.63 (0.4-1.01) 0.053
OS.P (≤313 vs. >313) 1.63 (0.9-2.98) 0.11
OS.ALB (≤46.3 vs. >46.3) 1.28 (0.77-2.12) 0.348
OS.GLOB (≤34.8 vs. >34.8) 1.67 (0.95-2.95) 0.077
Clinical T stage (1 vs. 2) 0.59 (0.28-1.26) 0.173 0.68 (0.32-1.45) 0.315
Clinical T stage (1 vs. 3) 0.88 (0.38-2.05) 0.771 0.95 (0.41-2.21) 0.905
Clinical T stage (1 vs. 4) 5.Nn(1.37-19.5) 0.015 5.70 (1.43-22.8) 0.014
Clinical N stage (0 vs. 1) 1.48 (0.32-6.86) 0.615
Clinical N stage (0 vs. 2) 1.19 (0.29-4.91) 0.81
Clinical N stage (0 vs. 3) 1.5° (0.35-6.42) 0.588
Clinical TNM stage (II vs. III) 0.92 (0.47-1.79) 0.806
Molecular subtype (luminal A vs. B) 1.43 (0.71-2.87) 0.311
Molecular subtype (luminal A vs. HER2-OE) 0.82 (0.34-1.96) 0.653
Molecular subtype (luminal A vs. TNBC) 1.35 (0.59-3.09) 0.472
ER (negative vs. positive) 1.28 (0.79-2.1) 0.317
PR (negative vs. positive) 1.09 (0.68-1.73) 0.721
HER-2 (negative vs. low expression) 1.07 (0.62-1.82) 0.818
HER-2 (negative vs. positive) 0.78 (0.44-1.4) 0.408
Ki-67 (<20% vs. ≥20%) 1.49 (0.92-2.4) 0.107
P53 (negative vs. positive) 1.4 (0.85-2.29) 0.187
Cycle (≤4 vs. >4) 1.23 (0.78-1.97) 0.374