Table 5.

Summary of Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool quality assessment—risk of bias of the included qualitative and mixed-methods studies.

Qualitative study, year	Appropriate to answer the research question	Adequate qualitative data collection methods used	Findings adequately derived from the data	Sufficient interpretation of results	Coherence in data collection, analysis, and interpretation	Risk of bias scorea
Lee et al [75], 2015	★b	★	★	★	—c	Low
Nguyen et al [80], 2017	★	★	★	★	★	Low
Senette et al [82], 2018	★	★	—	★	—	Moderate to high
Backonja et al [77], 2021	★	★	—	—	—	Moderate to high

^aOverall risk of bias scores were assessed by 2 independent reviewers and classified into low risk and moderate to high risk. Low risk of bias: ≥4 stars; moderate to high risk of bias: ≤3 stars.

^bMet the criterion.

^cInsufficient information given to decide.