Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 9;10(12):e40271. doi: 10.2196/40271

Table 7.

Acceptability ratings across the included quantitative studies.

Author, year, intervention type Acceptability measurements informed by the TAM2a model [72] Acceptability rating
Cadmus-Bertram et al [78], 2016, Fitbit-based intervention (activity tracker and app-based website)
  • User experience and satisfaction survey

  • Perceived ease of use

  • Perceived usefulness

  • Intention and likelihood of future use

  • A total of 96% (24/25) of midlife women liked the Fitbit app-based website.

  • There were lower perceived barriers associated with the use of Fitbit; 80% (20/25) reported no technical issues or difficulty with the trackers.

  • A total of 96% (24/25) rated Fitbit as “somewhat or very helpful” for increasing PAb compared with only 32% in the pedometer control group.

  • A total of 76% (19/25) reported that they would recommend Fitbit to a friend.

Valle et al [81], 2017, weight loss mobile intervention (tracker and app)
  • Program acceptability and satisfaction survey

  • Almost all the intervention group (11/11) was satisfied and rated the tracker as “extremely helpful” on a 4-point scale at 6 months.

Butryn et al [79], 2016, Fitbit-based intervention (tracker and app)
  • Satisfaction survey

  • Perceived confidence

  • Intention and likelihood of future use

  • At 6 months, 89% (25/28) of the participants rated the whole program as favorable for increasing PA on a 5-point Likert scale (mean 4.11 out of 5, SD 1.14). The Fitbit was reported as the “best part.”

  • After the intervention ended, 88% (24/28) reported confidence in the ability to maintain PA over the next 3 months.

  • At 6 months, 77% (22/28) reported that they had purchased or intended to purchase a device.

  • In total, 88% (24/28) agreed to recommend the program to others.

Sengupta et al [84], 2020, HerBeat mobile app and smartwatch
  • User satisfaction using the SUSc

  • Perceived usefulness and ease of use

  • Midlife women found the app features to be easy to use and well integrated (mean score on the SUS was 83.60, SD 16.4).

  • Participants somehow felt confident in using the app.

  • The most frequent technical complaints were regarding the short battery life of the smartwatch.

  • Participants had no adverse events or privacy concerns.

Joseph et al [56], 2021, Fitbit-based intervention (tracker and app)
  • Consumer satisfaction survey

  • Treatment acceptance was measured using an adapted consumer satisfaction survey to assess users’ perceptions of the intervention’s content, app usability, and preferences.

  • A total of 87% (13/15) of the women found the combined use of the Fitbit app and activity tracker helpful and “motivational to exercise.”

aTAM2: technology acceptance model 2.

bPA: physical activity.

cSUS: System Usability Scale.