Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 20;28:e938798-1–e938798-19. doi: 10.12659/MSM.938798
Quality of papers used Maslach Burnout Inventories (n=28)
Quality criteria Kwah et al [53] Kealy et al [54] Elmore et al [55] Fares et al [56] Popa-Velea et al [57] Almalki et al [58] Baer et al [59] Shakir et al [60] Van Vendeloo et al [61] Jamjoom et al [62] Al-Alawi et al [63] Asali et al [64] Alqurashi et al [65] AlShahrani, et al [66] Total/Percentage
Is hypothesis/aim/objective of study clearly described? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Are main outcomes to be measured clearly described? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Is the design of the study described? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Is the setting of study described? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Is the source of subjects studied stated? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Is distribution of study population by age and sex described? 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 11/79%
Is the sample size stated? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Is participation/follow up rate stated? 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 12/86%
Are non-participants/subjects lost to follow up described? NO 0 0 0 NA NA NA 0 0 0 1 0 0 NA 1/7%
Are the main findings of the study clearly described? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Are the statistical methods described? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Have actual probability values been reported? 0 0 0 NA 1 1 1 0 0 NA 0 NA 1 1 5/36%
Are any conclusions stated? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 14/100%
Were subjects asked to participate in study representative of entire population from which they were recruited? 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 12/86%
Were those subjects who were prepared to participate representative of entire population from which they were recruited? 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 8/57%
Was participation/follow up rate >80%? 1 0 1 NA 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 8/57%
Were the main outcome measures used accurate (valid and reliable)? 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 NA 1 1 1 1 0 1 11/79%
Was there adequate adjustment for confounding in analyses from which main findings were drawn? 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 9/64%
Was sample size justified? 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 8/54%
Analysis adjusts for length of follow up? (cohort only) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0/00%

1 classified as (Yes), 0 classified as (No), Unable to determine classified as (NA).