Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 24;9(1):465. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01403-1

Table 2.

Meeting attendance and the average number of redacted names over the study period.

Timeframe (TF) No. of meetings No. of expertsa listed in minutesb No. of experts named and attending 50% or more of meetingsc Number of experts named in meetings Average number of redacted namesd in meetings
Average Min. Max. Experts Observers Secretariat
TF1 16 37 15 15.1 8 21 1.25 1.00 4.63
TF2 23 56 32 28.3 16 37 0.30 2.13 7.26
TF3 19 78 35 29.0 7 47 0.63 6.47 13.21
TF4 16 74 36 34.9 29 42 0.56 7.00 15.94
TF5 15 79 39 38.3 30 44 0.67 8.27 15.20
Whole study period 89 142 32 29.0 7 47 0.65 10.78 4.76

aSome attendees switched from experts to observers and vice versa during the process—however, in our final count, we only accounted for each attendee’s most frequent role.

bThis is our count using our expert database, rather than the official count provided in the minutes. On some occasions, we found that the number of named attendees plus the listed redactions did not add up to the officially provided number of total attendees e.g., meeting 62.

cValue taken is rounded up, e.g., if 15 meetings, those listed attended eight or more meetings.

dThese are the officially provided counts for redactions in the meeting minutes.